VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:52:05 11/17/03 Mon
Author: Alan Yngve
Subject: HIP (lets get some debate started!)

The topic of this thread will be "Hidden Initial Placement" that is first introduced by rule 42 and SL Scenario #4. [This rule is not covered in TTS until a partial usage (planned for) Zeta-3.]

THE BIG ISSUE: If your force is permitted to use HIP, can you make a case for not necessarily using it for all of your forces?

I'd say that it is a reasonable tactic to consider an initial deployment with some of your forces deployed in view of the approaching enemy.

What do you say? And why?

Do you think that not using HIP makes your position weaker?

Please post away! -- Alan Yngve

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.