Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Thu, May 23 2024, 11:13:02

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

Subject: Re: walking away? Author: DavidH [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 07:16:12 11/20/04 Sat In reply to: Bev Ballagher 's message, "walking away?" on 13:31:01 11/16/04 Tue Is this not the worst possible scenario? Investing hard earned cash on the promise of secured future holidays only to be left with two choices - pay up, or give up! No middle ground, no structured options, no regulated payments. This sure cannot be allowed to continue. I too have been informed that none payment will mean being 'thrown out' as a member of CLC for whic acceptance back into it will be by paying all outstanding fees and possibly those criminal surcharges. Why should any one of us have to give up what is rightfully ours to a group of legalised bandits? [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Subject: Re: walking away? Author: Peter [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 12:30:32 11/20/04 Sat According to the Constitution, It is clearly laid out the methods to be used for non payment of managment fees. SURCHARGES ARE NOT ONE OF THEM. The owners committee members and the 2 CLC members CANNOT AND SHOULD NOT THREATEN Owners with PUNITIVE SURCHARGES. Should any Owner find themselves in a position that means the will need a little time to pay, I suggest they contact one of the OWNERS COMMITTEE REPS. Should they be told they will have to pay punitive surchages, I suggest that they contact a solicitor with a copy of the Constitution.

[> [> [> Subject: Re: walking away? Author: pauline [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 09:32:44 11/12/05 Sat >According to the Constitution, It is clearly laid out >the methods to be used for non payment of managment >fees. >SURCHARGES ARE NOT ONE OF THEM. >The owners committee members and the 2 CLC members >CANNOT AND SHOULD NOT THREATEN Owners with PUNITIVE >SURCHARGES. >Should any Owner find themselves in a position that >means the will need a little time to pay, I suggest >they contact one of the OWNERS COMMITTEE REPS. >Should they be told they will have to pay punitive >surchages, I suggest that they contact a solicitor >with a copy of the Constitution. i think if anyone is in this unfortunate position it would be much better to offer the week for £100 to 1st come who prove to be genuine owners is better than giving it back to CLC i HAVE SEEN THIS DONE AT sUNSET HARBOUR.