VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:07:00 10/05/00 Thu
Author: Barbo
Subject: Limiting my remarks to Republicratic concerns.
In reply to: Barbo 's message, "Duh Debates" on 20:04:54 10/05/00 Thu

Is it just me or are the vice presidential candidates far better suited to run for President
than either Gore or Bush?
I just tuned into their debate and after only an hour, have witnessed a startling contrast
between the vp candidates' ability to discuss specifics and articulate their parties' views,
and the presidential candidates' utter innability to to do just that.
Al and George look like rank amatuers compared Cheney and Lieberman!
When was the last time that happened in an American presidential race?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.