Re: Who would I have attecked, Afganistan, then Pakistan, where ever bin Laden... -- Albany MSNBC Refugees Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Saturday, April 15, 05:11:57pm
Author: BJ
Subject: Re: Who would I have attecked, Afganistan, then Pakistan, where ever bin Laden...
In reply to: Ace 's message, "BJ, by your logic, there is no one we should be..." on Thursday, April 13, 06:33:14pm

ran to and the crap about Pakistan as being a ally is bull, if bin laden is hiding there he isn't any ally. Plus, like Iraq, another close ally once, we will be fighting Pakistan sooner or later. Maybe you forgot who attacked us, bin Laden, not a country, not Saddem, not Iran, but bin Laden, the name bush wants you to forget.

Clinton, the Balkans, a win, not one American life lost.

9/11, bush's watch, you can't change history.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

For one who makes a great deal of noise... -- Ace, Monday, April 17, 07:44:17pm
- Re: For one who makes a great deal of noise... -- b, Tuesday, April 18, 09:24:17am
  - If you are going to make comparisons, lets look at Viet Nam. -- Ace, Friday, April 21, 11:56:47am
    - Re: "lets look at Viet Nam." yes, read your history son, it was Ike's war... -- BJ, Saturday, April 22, 04:46:45pm
      - Our involvement in Viet Nam under Eisenhower... -- Ace, Saturday, April 22, 06:27:18pm
        Re: Ike, like bush, starts a war then drops it into the next guys lap... -- BJ, Sunday, April 23, 10:35:16pm
        SPIN, SPIN, SPIN (NT) -- Ace, Friday, April 28, 11:01:13pm
    - Re: If you are going to make comparisons, lets look at Viet Nam. -- b, Saturday, April 22, 07:44:43pm
      - The question was not relevant to the argument. -- Ace, Friday, April 28, 11:07:39pm
        Re: Sure it is ace, you just can't defend your position like usual you bore -- BJ, Monday, May 01, 11:02:10am
        Re: The question was not relevant to the argument. -- b, Monday, May 01, 01:48:17pm
        You and bj just don't want to face the facts. (NT) -- Ace, Monday, May 15, 06:39:43pm
        Re: You and bj just don't want to face the facts. -- b, Tuesday, May 16, 02:15:53pm
        I guess you can read but comprehension is another matter. -- Ace, Tuesday, May 16, 05:55:58pm
        Re: I guess you can read but comprehension is another matter. -- b, Thursday, May 18, 04:22:32pm
        Defending the country is no simple matter. -- Ace, Friday, May 19, 10:59:54am
        3000+ due to Clinton's unwillingness to address the terrorism problem earlier. (NT) -- Ace, Friday, May 19, 11:35:06pm
        Re: 3000+ due to Clinton's unwillingness to address the terrorism problem earlier. -- b, Monday, May 22, 10:33:43am
        Re: 3000+ due to Bush ignoring intelligence information.. -- b, Monday, May 22, 12:33:31pm
        Re: 3000+ due to THE LAST 5 ADMINISTRATIONS ignoring intelligence information.. -- Brassman, Monday, May 22, 09:43:47pm