Re: 2006 TC? -- fifl

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:09:11 08/02/04 Mon
Author: Joe, Portland
Author Host/IP: 66.224.1.206
Subject: Re: 2006 TC?
In reply to: Jimmy 's message, "2006 TC?" on 19:08:14 08/02/04 Mon

I don't know what this means, but it sounds important ...
>The FIFL determined efforts to hold the line as far as
>"stats will remain consistant with past seasons"
>apperars to be a success in 2006. To that end, they
>took a major 'Brave New World' [Aldous Huxley?!?] step
>this season. There were a few surprises, and general
>disappointment (according to early GM input?)
>throughtout the league. But is that disappointment
>justified? Not in the minds of the scribes that
>regularly cover this league. "Obviously, all results
>have not been compiled to date" said Louisiana
>underworld figure Sid Viscious. "But it is obvious
>that potentials on both sides of the ball were
>addressed, downward in a significant manner. The odd
>increases in unexpected areas happenned, as they
>always will. Perhaps the oddest increase was LB AG?
>Overall, those who complain will be out of sorts with
>mainstream critics." Jury is in RE the 2006 draft,
>FIFL NOT GUILTY. ROCK ON!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: 2006 TC? - What Increased -- FIFL Commish, 12:20:52 08/03/04 Tue

Re: 2006 TC? - What Increased -- Mike, 12:31:34 08/03/04 Tue

Re: 2006 TC? - What Increased -- John (Fargo Freeze), 15:59:35 08/03/04 Tue

I think my differences are a bit bigger -- Josh (Steel Valley), 20:35:07 08/03/04 Tue

Re: 2006 TC? - What Increased -- Christian - Colorado, 05:47:43 08/04/04 Wed

Re: 2006 TC? - What Increased -- John (Fargo Freeze), 13:22:36 08/04/04 Wed
- All you have to do is... - Go To Past Seasons!!!!! -- FIFL Commish, 16:44:22 08/04/04 Wed
  - Re: All you have to do is... - Go To Past Seasons!!!!! -- John (Fargo Freeze), 22:47:53 08/04/04 Wed

Re: 2006 TC? - What Increased -- Ian Verhaegen (Austin), 06:17:12 08/04/04 Wed