VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:25:41 05/12/02 Sun
Author: Guess you don't though, huh?
Subject: Well I hate to burst your little bubble, but this is the year 2002. Things are changing. Just about 5 yrs ago, NOBODY would consider a formal to be a two piece outfit. Things are different. I personally like new and different things.
In reply to: Don't get me wrong , the child was beautiful! The judging was just not good! 's message, "First off, the purple outfit was not swimwear,it was not made out of stretchy material, it was made out of cotton. It was a skirt and tank top, it looked like a dance costume! She wore a garter on her arm. Boys wear garters on their arms, girls wear garters on their legs!" on 18:50:11 05/12/02 Sun


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.