Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Mon, May 18 2026, 0:06:07

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3] ]

Subject: Arminianism, Calvinism, or a compromise? Author: E. Popp [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: Mon, May 06 2002, 16:23:49 Which is truth? Does one exclude the other? Or does a compromise exist? [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Subject: Re: Arminianism, Calvinism, or a compromise? Author: Rachel [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Tue, May 07 2002, 10:31:26 Hi. Interesting question. In my limited understanding, the big arguments between Calvinism and Arminianism have to do with resistable vs. irresistable grace, whether salvation can be lost, and who is "predestined." Perhaps a reconcilliation could be found in this analogy (though I do not claim to have it all figured out, and don't pretend that my little word story will solve generations of theological debate) I am my father's daughter. I did not choose my father. I can choose to walk in fellowship with him, but the opportunity for a relationship stems from something completely out of my control. Now, I can also choose to NOT walk in relationship with him too(which I wouldn't do...I have a great dad). That wouldn't make me cease to be his kid, but it would sever all communion with him, and all the benefits of that connection. And I would be left on my own without his help/counsel/leadership. Or, I could have some sort of barrier (disease, etc.) that made me incapable of recognizing him as dad. Is he still technically my father? Yes. Does he still want to love me and know me? Yes. Can I see that? Not with the barrier in place. God knows that He is the Father of people. He also knows that some will accept that relationship, others will resist it, and still others will not be able to see that it exists. But He's still the Father, regardless. And He continues to call out to us and to draw us. We didn't make ourselves, so we can't make ourselves His kids. We ARE His kids by virtue of our existence. But our ability to live in community with Him, to know Him and love Him and serve Him, is predicated on our willingness to be who we are in Him. What does salvation do? It opens up the opportunity for a relationship with God. Before the foundations of the world, we were all God's kids/creation. That's predestined. But whether we apprehend our relationship with God, THAT is something we have some control over. Hmm. That was more muddled than I would have liked. Did it make any sense? Thoughts, comments?

[> Subject: Re: Arminianism, Calvinism, or a compromise? Author: Jeff Davis [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Sat, Jun 01 2002, 20:19:16 Dr. Norman Geisler proposed a seemingly very plausible compromise between the two in his book, "Chosen but Free." After discussing this book with my friend Will Mitchell, Will made an assertion I will never forget: "Who are you going to listen to? Norman Geisler, or JOHN CALVIN?" While he was just trying to be funny, I think he caused me to reexamine what I thought about the subject. No matter how much authors Mr. Geisler or G. K. Chesterton argue against Calvinists and determinists, I just can't get around what it says in Romans 8:56-70 - "He who searches the hearts knows what the mind of the Spirit is, because He intercedes for the saints according to the will of God. And we know that God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose. For those whom He foreknew, He also predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son, so that He would be the firstborn among many brethren; and these whom He predestined, He also called; and these whom He called, He also justified; and these whom He justified, He also glorified. What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who is against us?" I just don't see how we can say that God has a purpose and plan for every individual without also concluding that He planned the means to that end. Paul seems pretty clear that God foreknew and predestined who He would call, save, and glorify. So basically, I am a Calvinist.

[> [> Subject: Re: Arminianism, Calvinism, or a compromise? Author: Robbie [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Thu, Apr 24 2003, 10:42:13 Going off what Squeezer said, if every knee will bow, etc. and all will be saved then what is the need for Hell? What about those scriptures that speak of the lost, the sinful, those who don't repent and recieve salvation going to the fiery pits of Hell?

[> [> [> Subject: Fiery pits of hell? Author: B. Bellrook [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Sat, Jul 24 2004, 9:34:10 I read a book by Lee Strobel not too long ago, and was very impressed with an opinion that I found in the pages. What if hell isn't really a torture chamber? People often use that excuse to not believe in a loving God. "How could he send his children to a fiery hell?" Well, what if He doesn't? You can play the blame game all day. "Well, if we don't choose Him, then it's our fault." - "Oh, but can't He give someone a second chance?" Blah blah blah. Flame, in the Bible, often speaks of judgement. Just as water speaks of spirit. "Wailing and gnashing of teeth" are things that I do sometimes over a bad decision, but we're going to turn it into a torture chamber? No. I think that Hell, simply put, is somewhere that God is not. Obviously that's not going to be the hottest spot in Creation as far as fun is concerned, but that doesn't mean that it's a place of eternal pain and suffering of the "Wow, my skin is boiling off" variety.

[> [> Subject: Re: Arminianism, Calvinism, or a compromise? Author: David [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Sun, May 04 2003, 0:01:46 This is one of my favorite subjects. I am certainly not a Calvinist or an Arminiast but rather what I call a Weak Arminiast. That is a wonderful passage in Romans you quoted and infact, it set's for us the structure of salvation and order in which it happens. Romans 8:29-30, the beef of the subject. Notice how the order works. Foreknew-->Predestined-->Conformed to Christs Image-->Called-->Justified-->Glorified We know who we are talking about because of the last two elements, justified and glorified. Only the saved are justified because apart from Christ I don't have justification and so salvation. This passage is talking about the predestined saints. I feel foreknowledge ALWAYS comes before predestination. Do a word study on the foreknowledge of God and you will see that God ONLY foreknows the saints. That is not to say he doesn't know who will reject him. This is just something applied to believers. What this shows is that God only states his foreknowledge of the saints and so the only ones predestined are the ones he foreknew. I do not insist this is what the truth is but I do believe it's closer. You can't read Romans 8:29-30 and yet reject all the passages that speak of persisting in the faith. Robbie, a pastor I know doesn't call anyone non-believers but will only call them believers and pre-believers. This is because eventually everyone WILL believe. It will just be to late.

[> [> Subject: Re: Arminianism, Calvinism, or a compromise? Author: Will Mitchell [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Wed, Feb 25 2004, 11:14:19 It's just strange to find my name on the internet. I love Will Mitchell. Oh yeah and I'm a Calvinist too.

[> Subject: Re: Arminianism, Calvinism, or a compromise? Author: The Squeezer [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Sun, Aug 04 2002, 20:03:09 They both have there faults. Calvinism says that God can save all but does not want to. Arminianism sayst that God wants to saved all but can not. The truth is that God desires all men to be saved and he will accomplish it. Peace, The Squeezer.

[> [> Subject: Re: Arminianism, Calvinism, or a compromise? Author: Jeff Davis [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Tue, Sep 10 2002, 18:19:45 What do you mean that "He desires all men to be saved and will accomplish it?" Jesus is clear throughout the gospels that there is a Hell, and sinners who have not turned to Jesus for their hope and salvation will be there after judgement. It is not right to use our own reasoning process and cultural standards when our conclusions contradict scripture.

[> [> [> Subject: Re: Arminianism, Calvinism, or a compromise? Author: The Squeezer [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Fri, Sep 20 2002, 5:38:32 I mean what the Bible says when it says he is the savior of all men especially those that believe. The Bible says that every knee will bow and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of the Father. If they do this they will be saved. Everyone will go to heaven eventually whether the Baptists and Pentecostals like it or not. If you do not believe this you have not yet been born again. You will be eventually. Peace. /\/\/\/\

[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Arminianism, Calvinism, or a compromise? Author: isaac [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Mon, Feb 17 2003, 1:42:45 Every knee will bow ,every tongue will confess but that doesn't make them all born again. Your born again/saved or a bible believing christian because you ** want** to bow and ** want ** to confess that Jesus is Lord but not just Lord but also Saviour . recognise now that Jesus is Lord and our Saviour only then will he saveyour eternal life

[> Subject: Re: Arminianism, Calvinism, or a compromise? Author: Pete [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Tue, Nov 19 2002, 6:15:59 Squeezer quotes "every knee will bow and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of the Father" and concludes: "if they do this they will be saved." I see one little problem with this: a small issue of *timing*. Yes, every knee EVENTUALLY will bow. Ultimately, even SATAN will bow and confess that Jesus is Lord. ALL will recognize His Lordship. But by then it is too late. Choose Him now and be saved. Wait, procrastinate, die -- and you've chosen eternal separation.