Re: We're royally fucked -- It's Debateable

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3] ]

Subject: Re: We're royally fucked

Author:
Alan

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09:37:56 06/29/02 Sat
In reply to: Anne 's message, "Re: We're royally fucked" on 09:20:09 06/29/02 Sat

>>>So you're not a fan of the Bill of Rights, then? You
>>>think the rule against searching people without a
>>>warrant is wrong--that that just lets criminals off
>on
>>>"technicalities"? Ugh, how disgusting.
>>
>>I'm well aware of the Bill of Rights. But obviously
>>random drug testing remains within those rights,
>>because it's done everywhere you turn around nowadays.
>> My husband administers them regularly to his
>>employees.
>>
>>I'm assuming we're talking about a urine test here,
>>not extensive blood work. I have no problem with my
>>kids being subjected to peeing in a cup every now and
>>then to test them.
>>
>>It's unfortunate that it's come to this, but drugs are
>>ILLEGAL, and have no place in public schools.
>
>One more thing - it sickens me to see criminals get
>off on technicalities.

Not me--I'm glad to see the Bill of Rights enforced.

>But I don't so much blame the
>judicial system for that, as I do the low-life
>attorneys who make it their goal in life to free known
>criminals.

Oh, good grief. You may be AWARE of the Bill of Rights, but you are not in FAVOUR of many of its provisions.

Alan

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: We're royally fucked	Astrid	10:18:58 06/29/02 Sat

Re: We're royally fucked	Anne	12:46:04 06/29/02 Sat
Re: We're royally fucked -- Astrid, 13:33:59 06/29/02 Sat Re: We're royally fucked -- Anne, 14:46:29 06/29/02 Sat Re: We're royally fucked -- Astrid, 21:41:21 06/29/02 Sat Re: We're royally fucked -- Alan, 07:39:49 06/30/02 Sun Re: We're royally fucked -- Michelle, 12:42:14 06/30/02 Sun Re: We're royally fucked -- Alan, 03:50:32 07/01/02 Mon Re: We're royally fucked -- Alan, 07:41:39 06/30/02 Sun Re: We're royally fucked -- Astrid, 13:36:11 06/29/02 Sat Re: We're royally fucked -- Alan, 07:44:47 06/30/02 Sun Re: We're royally fucked -- Bruja, 13:35:38 07/02/02 Tue Re: We're royally fucked -- Alan, 07:37:04 06/30/02 Sun Re: We're royally fucked -- Michelle, 12:45:04 06/30/02 Sun Re: We're royally fucked -- Alan, 03:55:03 07/01/02 Mon Re: We're royally fucked -- Anne, 05:16:07 07/01/02 Mon Re: We're royally fucked -- Alan, 01:36:23 07/02/02 Tue Re: We're royally fucked -- Anne, 05:22:57 07/02/02 Tue