VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]
Subject: Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT Cobra


Author:
1 Bad 88 GT
 		[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 00:45:04 09/07/03 Sun
In reply to: KJHolgate 's message, "Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT Cobra" on 16:36:36 04/01/03 Tue
 >I think the SS is better than an SVT. The reason why
>is because an SS runs a 4.54 seconds to 60 and goes
>down 1/4 mile in 12.61 @ 109 mph!* But a SVT has a
>390hp engine and is still is about 500 pounds heavier
>than an SS with just 325hp too! An SVT runs 4.61 to 60
>and covers 1/4 mile in 12.69 @ 114 mph!* The other
>thing is that the SVT took everything from the Camaro
>SS ( transmission, tires, design of traction control,
>suspension, and air induction design) and also they
>would have to stick a supercharger to make 390hp and
>390 ft.-lb. of torque in there too.
>*Based on all imformation.


Based on all information you're a dumbass. A 6spd 02 SS bonestock runs about 13.25@109 in the 1/4 and a 5.2 0-60(Motortrend and Automobile). A 03 Cobra runs the 1/4 in 12.43@114 and 0-60 in 4.6-4.7(MM&FF, 5.0, Motortrend). You also need to use a different set of scales as the Cobra isn't 500#'s heavier than the SS it weighs 3665# while the SS is 3320#. As far as stealing parts The T56 was originally designed for the Viper so who stole what? The Cobras T56 is entirely different than the Viper spec or the GM tranny in that it uses an integral bellhousing. Suspension? WTF? The SS uses a front SLA and solid rear while the Cobra uses a front MacPherson strut and IRS. OK, air induction, Ford was the first to succesfully use Mass Air on the 5.0's and Gm later went that way as well. Again SS uses a centrally located MAF and filter box while the Cobra uses a side mounted MAF and inner fender entry.

Basically this tells me you don't know shit about anything as you got every single thing you rambled on about wrong. Good job Brain trust! ;)
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT CobraMike23:32:47 09/24/03 Wed
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT CobraBill Gates09:48:53 10/03/03 Fri
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT Cobramatt17:15:44 10/05/03 Sun
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT Cobraclint19:46:51 10/10/03 Fri
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT CobraSean18:20:29 01/05/04 Mon
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT Cobradaren jones17:32:28 01/13/04 Tue
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT CobraSAM00:13:05 10/15/04 Fri
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT Cobrawill (bring your little ss to ky for an asswhippen)22:58:13 02/16/07 Fri
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT Cobrawill (bring your little ss to ky for an asswhippin)23:16:16 02/16/07 Fri

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.