Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

Subject: If Prescott lets that Herzog run with his highly modified firewall you can kiss alot of cars good bye.

Author: One of your outlaw 10.5 cars

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 11:12:09 07/11/03 Fri Author Host/IP: 66.210.89.130 In reply to: Matt Cook 's message, "rules question: some of the cars in our organization, do not have stock firewalls, but they are required to carry 52% on the front wheels. Would this be legal for your race on the 19th? also are bolt in front subframes legal for 63-66 chevy 2's? We are interested in bringing some cars from TEXAS OUTLAW 10.5 RACING ASSOC. and need to know the rules. also are headlamps required? I talked to David the other day and misplaced his phone number." on 10:32:09 07/11/03 Fri Nothing against the Herzogs but that firewall in that car of his is bullshit and having his motor that far back does help him out. Look at his car compaired to other camaros and firebird and tell me he does not have a advantage. 52% of weight on the front or not. A friend of mine has the same type car and his car carries 54% nose weight because his motor is not sitting behind the strut tower. Cole this is your race not the new TORA groups. Keep the rules fare to all not just bend them so one guy can come race. He (Herzog)runs more off then Mr Cook thinks he does. Ask other racers who have seen Brians car up close what they think and see if they want to race with him. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
is this the same person who posted something about the Herzogs car on wheelsup.net? if you could contact me I would like to hear your reasons for your feelings on the issue. and feel free to call me anonymously. I will not reveal your identity. 281 320 1185. or 281 684 8844 (NT)	MATT COOK (216.119.145.164)	11:37:45 07/11/03 Fri
matt ... call steve (the track owner) at 1 501 262 9498 or david at 870-777-3816 (NT) -- cole, 13:10:15 07/11/03 Fri (24.174.99.117) Re: is this the same person who posted something about the Herzogs car on wheelsup.net? if you could contact me I would like to hear your reasons for your feelings on the issue. and feel free to call me anonymously. I will not reveal your identity. 281 320 1185. or 281 684 8844 -- one of your outlaw10.5 cars, 15:02:48 07/11/03 Fri (66.210.89.130) These matters are under review by The track owner and the Prescott Outlaws tech staff. I will get back with you guys as soon as we decide. (NT) -- Junkman, 15:14:28 07/11/03 Fri (65.64.24.246) another car (65 chevy 2) that has a bolt in front subframe, it , by our rules is required to run 52% on the front. the car went from 50.1% front to 52.2% on the front and it went from 4.90's to 5.20's with no other changes! 60' fell off 7 hundreths. so the 52% rule negates ANY advantage of engine setback. if you really do have a car then you know how this all works. I hope this is not who I think it is, because that would be very dissapointing to our group. (NT) -- Matt, 10:36:09 07/12/03 Sat (65.69.5.245)