VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:52:26 03/25/03 Tue
Author: *
Subject: Re: The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
In reply to: Captain America 's message, "The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge" on 14:42:05 03/25/03 Tue

Here, here.



>1) How much oil is in the Arctic National Wildlife
>Refuge? According to the U.S. Geological Service, 3.2
>billion barrels. The United States consumes 7.2
>billion barrels each year (Annual Energy Review 1999,
>U.S. Department of Energy.)
>
>2) Liberals, Conservatives, oilmen and
>conservationists all agree that if we started today,
>it would take a minimum of ten years to bring any
>ANWAR oil to market.
>
>3) Raising the fuel efficiency standards of ALL cars
>to only 27.5 miles per gallon (this is already the
>standard for most cars) would save one million barrels
>of oil EACH DAY (Union of Concerned Scientists)
>
>4) Based on the above data, in a ten year period (the
>same amount of time it would take to bring ANWAR oil
>to market) the US would save 3.65 billion barrels of
>oil … that is MORE than the amount of oil that ANWAR
>has, according to the U.S. Department of Energy.
>
>Twenty years at the slightly higher fuel efficiency
>standards … we’d save more oil than two ANWAR’s … and
>the savings would continue to add up.
>
>This slightly higher fuel efficiency standard would
>also be consumer friendly … saving Americans $45
>Billion per year at the pump …
>
>And it would reduce our need for foreign oil …
>increasing homeland security.
>
>I guess that this is why, last week in the Senate,
>moderate Republicans joined together with Democrats to
>defeat the President’s plan to drill in this wildlife
>preserve, and rightly so.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.