Re: suda constitution & IVDA - comments -- universitydancesport.com forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

Subject: Re: suda constitution & IVDA - comments

Author:
Alice

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:11:41 10/30/03 Thu
In reply to: Shell 's message, "Re: suda constitution & IVDA - comments" on 17:44:50 10/30/03 Thu

>1) 1.4.1
>Are SUDA electing their own standing committee? In
>the past two years (and this year or so I thought)
>SUDA exec committee chose to use IVDA standing
>committee. There is a note in the SC guidelines about
>this as well. I think it's preferable to use the IVDA
>SC as you get continuity of policy and less confusion.
> PLus will you actually find 5 members of SUDA general
>committee to be on the SUDA SC?

Doubt it. SO...do I change it to some wording that says that we use the IVDA SC? That'd make most sense.
>
>2) I think it may be worthwhile having a list of SUDA
>trophies in the constitution. You mention how the
>best newcomer is calculated and I know Caroline has
>been looking into how the best beginners couple & team
>are calculated for IVDA. Do SUDA have a best
>beginners couple/team trophy or a most promising
>couple trophy? If so, maybe a note about how they are
>calculated would be helpful.

Yep, sounds good. Will go in when we get the info through....hint, hint, we'd love a cheque too!
>
>3) typo 2.1.9 tuition

Ooops :(
>
>4) Points 2.1.14, 2.8.6 and 2.17 about walk on order
>contradict themselves
>2.1.14 says teams walk on in alphabetical order.
>2.8.6 and 2.17 says teams walk on in the order
>determined by ballot at the Autumn GM.
>I thought there was a ballot - either the same as or
>a reversal of the IVDA walk on ballot (minus northern
>teams obviously) was used for SUDA team walk on. The
>offbeat is then a reversal of the team match walk on
>order.

We'll have one of those. Anyone else have a conclusive opinion of what happens normally?
>
>5) 2.8.11: why is only C team mentioned? Bit random.

You're telling me! :)

Much grateful,

Alice :)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: suda walk on	Justine	18:27:07 10/30/03 Thu
SUDA standing committee -- Robin, 18:33:43 10/30/03 Thu Re: SUDA standing committee -- Shell, 18:50:23 10/30/03 Thu Re: SUDA standing committee -- Shell, 19:15:57 10/30/03 Thu