VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234[5]6 ]
Subject: punishments


Author:
Caroline
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 23:36:02 05/25/03 Sun
In reply to: karen 's message, "Re: combined int adv.." on 23:02:49 05/25/03 Sun

according to the standing committee docs on this site Standing committee can make the following punishments for constitutional infringements
Stripping all titles of individuals and/or clubs
fine the club/society for a maximum of 200
ban the individual/guilty party

Therefore I would be worried about people ignoring me when I told them what level to enter, and then me getting the fine! team captains need to have control....




>team captains get fined for people dancing down or up
>or whatever? never heard that one before. how much's
>that? with such floating rules as we have at the
>moment, has it ever occured?
>
>>
>>well I only read part of it and it sounded a bit to
>>simple from what people explained...but sure someone
>>will explain it to me :)
>>Personally, it's a team captains job. After all it is
>>the team captain and society that gets fined if the
>>people representing them break rules. If they do not
>>have control over people they should not take them...
>>
>>>
>>>>Anyway, the thing that worries me is that, if we
>mess
>>>>intermediates around too much they will all leave
>and
>>>>we will have no advanced people at all! Seriously,
>we
>>>>should work on helping people, not shoving
>>>>restrictions left right and centre. I am as much in
>>>>favour of people having a go, and moving up as the
>>>>next person. But I honestly believe that we can't
>get
>>>>a decent result out of shoving rules everywhere.
>>>
>>>If you read every one of Robin's or mine messages,
>>>you'll find there's no restrictins/rules at all.
>>>
>>>>Ivda is pushed for time as it is but, perhaps we can
>>>>run intermediate up to semi final/final. Then find a
>>>>way to run a combined comp with advanced.. (Advanced
>>>>bring some normal clothes and just do the int dances
>>>>against the intermediate) I am not along alis lines
>>of
>>>>doing all the maths and working out timings, but
>then
>>>>we could compare the 2 levels, and anyone really out
>>>>of place in advanced would be given a by into the
>>last
>>>>round of intermediate, before it was run... And the
>>>>intermdiates would be able to judge their level,
>just
>>>>like we did for advanced ex students.
>>>>I am making no sense but does anyone see where I am
>>>>going?
>>>>Probably not practical, but I have not heard
>anything
>>>>else particulary feasible yet...
>>>
>>>Again if you read through more discussions obove, you
>>>might realise Robin's proposal is much much simpler
>>>than what you suggested.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: punishmentssares12:05:57 05/26/03 Mon


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.