| Subject: Re: punishments |
Author:
sares
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 12:05:57 05/26/03 Mon
In reply to:
Caroline
's message, "punishments" on 23:36:02 05/25/03 Sun
>according to the standing committee docs on this site
>Standing committee can make the following punishments
>for constitutional infringements
>Stripping all titles of individuals and/or clubs
>fine the club/society for a maximum of 200
>ban the individual/guilty party
>
>Therefore I would be worried about people ignoring me
>when I told them what level to enter, and then me
>getting the fine! team captains need to have
>control....
>
hmmm - i'm confused here...? please enlighten me! as i understand it we have *guidelines* and not rules. ao how can people be punished? guidelines merely make recommendations as to what individuals *should* do. Since they do not command people to dance in certain categories and they set no qualifications (as such) for dancers to dance in the respective categories, these guidelines, by their very definition, cannot be infringed. so how can the standing committee deal out punishments for infringements of parts of the constitution that logically cannot be infringed? muchissimo confusion. :os
>
>
>
>>team captains get fined for people dancing down or up
>>or whatever? never heard that one before. how much's
>>that? with such floating rules as we have at the
>>moment, has it ever occured?
>>
>>>
>>>well I only read part of it and it sounded a bit to
>>>simple from what people explained...but sure someone
>>>will explain it to me :)
>>>Personally, it's a team captains job. After all it is
>>>the team captain and society that gets fined if the
>>>people representing them break rules. If they do not
>>>have control over people they should not take them...
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Anyway, the thing that worries me is that, if we
>>mess
>>>>>intermediates around too much they will all leave
>>and
>>>>>we will have no advanced people at all! Seriously,
>>we
>>>>>should work on helping people, not shoving
>>>>>restrictions left right and centre. I am as much in
>>>>>favour of people having a go, and moving up as the
>>>>>next person. But I honestly believe that we can't
>>get
>>>>>a decent result out of shoving rules everywhere.
>>>>
>>>>If you read every one of Robin's or mine messages,
>>>>you'll find there's no restrictins/rules at all.
>>>>
>>>>>Ivda is pushed for time as it is but, perhaps we
>can
>>>>>run intermediate up to semi final/final. Then find
>a
>>>>>way to run a combined comp with advanced..
>(Advanced
>>>>>bring some normal clothes and just do the int
>dances
>>>>>against the intermediate) I am not along alis lines
>>>of
>>>>>doing all the maths and working out timings, but
>>then
>>>>>we could compare the 2 levels, and anyone really
>out
>>>>>of place in advanced would be given a by into the
>>>last
>>>>>round of intermediate, before it was run... And the
>>>>>intermdiates would be able to judge their level,
>>just
>>>>>like we did for advanced ex students.
>>>>>I am making no sense but does anyone see where I am
>>>>>going?
>>>>>Probably not practical, but I have not heard
>>anything
>>>>>else particulary feasible yet...
>>>>
>>>>Again if you read through more discussions obove,
>you
>>>>might realise Robin's proposal is much much simpler
>>>>than what you suggested.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 