VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07:24:49 06/01/02 Sat
Author: yasmin
Subject: Re:!
In reply to: t 's message, "Re:!" on 05:34:39 06/01/02 Sat

lol. Its my interpretation of Rugby and as interpretations go, its clearly a valid one. Now if i said Rugby was the tamest alternaitve to tennis or something completely ridiculous and random like that with no ground for support, i would understand ur flippancy. But I and others have thought this out.

I am not saying i am rite. just that it is one perspective and we should be open to a wide variety of perspectives. You say u have played rugby tim and u feel me to be incorrect but then on the opposite side of the scale, Rich too has played rugby and he agrees wit me.

And my theory cannot b scrapped without evidence to prove otherwise. I have stated my case and watched rugby to give the examples i have. Obviously my examples do not prove without doubt my theory to be correct but it provides some support for my arguement. But then as with all theories in sociology and psycology have faults in them or do not have enough evidence, but this does not stop them from being recognised, not as an absolute truth but as one intepretation.

ooo and under post modernism, i can claim i am right, but that would be awfully cocky of me so i wont. but no one is gonna tell me i'm wrong either. yay.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.