Re: I agree! -- Flambers Drugstore

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Mon, March 21 2005, 14:44:09
Author: Peter van der Hoog
Subject: Re: I agree!
In reply to: Katerina 's message, "Re: I agree!" on Mon, March 21 2005, 10:11:27

>But it does not give an answer and only adds more confusion.
Sorry for that.
>I really don't understand why awareness of unfitness and hiding it is an evolutionary advantage.
Since you are not interested in the evolutionary perspective, why bother?

>Not everything can be explained from the evolutionary perspective
I fully agree
>at least I don't see the connection and still find it farfetched.
And maybe you are right but I see the connection and I don't find it farfetched.

I hope you can live with that.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

I can't just take it on faith -- Katerina, Tue, March 22 2005, 3:28:15
- Re: I can't just take it on faith -- Peter van der Hoog, Tue, March 22 2005, 6:56:08
  - Did I say that? -- Katerina, Tue, March 22 2005, 7:21:27
    - Re: Did I say that? -- Peter van der Hoog, Tue, March 22 2005, 12:05:03
    - Re: Did I say that? -- Peter van der Hoog, Tue, March 22 2005, 12:09:40
      - Re: Did I say that? -- Peter van der Hoog, Tue, March 22 2005, 13:07:03
        Not an integral -- Katerina, Wed, March 23 2005, 2:27:30
        Re: Not an integral -- Peter van der Hoog, Wed, March 23 2005, 7:04:14
        Re: Not an integral -- Katerina, Wed, March 23 2005, 8:14:11
        Re: Not an integral -- Peter van der Hoog, Wed, March 23 2005, 13:34:53
        Re: Not an integral -- Katerina, Wed, March 23 2005, 14:49:25
        Re: Not an integral -- Peter van der Hoog, Sun, March 27 2005, 11:46:07
        Re: Not an integral -- Katerina, Sun, March 27 2005, 13:11:03
        Re: Not an integral -- Peter van der Hoog, Sun, March 27 2005, 18:31:29
        Re: Not an integral -- Katerina, Mon, March 28 2005, 1:39:29
        Re: Not an integral -- Peter van der Hoog, Mon, March 28 2005, 4:38:07
        Re: Not an integral -- Katerina, Mon, March 28 2005, 7:52:15
        Re: Not an integral -- Peter van der Hoog, Mon, March 28 2005, 8:36:21
        Re: Not an integral -- Katerina, Mon, March 28 2005, 8:58:48
        Re: Not an integral -- Peter van der Hoog, Mon, March 28 2005, 13:24:32
        So I supposed just to take ur thesis as an axiom? -- Katerina, Tue, March 29 2005, 2:42:25
        Re: So I supposed just to take ur thesis as an axiom? -- Peter van der Hoog, Tue, March 29 2005, 12:08:18
        Re: So I supposed just to take ur thesis as an axiom? -- Katerina, Wed, March 30 2005, 3:55:23
        One more off -- Katerina, Wed, March 23 2005, 10:05:48
        Re: One more off -- Peter van der Hoog, Wed, March 23 2005, 13:32:15
        Re: One more off -- Katerina, Wed, March 23 2005, 14:01:27
        You don't have to place yer results here -- Todd, Fri, March 25 2005, 9:25:06
        Re: You don't have to place yer results here -- Peter van der Hoog, Sat, March 26 2005, 6:17:40
        Were u a satanist according to the results indeed? -- Katerina, Sat, March 26 2005, 6:23:42
        Re: Were u a satanist according to the results indeed? -- Peter van der Hoog, Sun, March 27 2005, 6:55:34
        It is just a mirror -- Katerina, Sun, March 27 2005, 7:46:36
        Re: It is just a mirror -- Peter van der Hoog, Sun, March 27 2005, 11:12:34
        Re: It is just a mirror -- Katerina, Sun, March 27 2005, 11:35:52
        Re: It is just a mirror -- Peter van der Hoog, Sun, March 27 2005, 17:59:05
        Re: It is just a mirror -- Katerina, Mon, March 28 2005, 0:46:17
        Re: It is just a mirror -- Peter van der Hoog, Mon, March 28 2005, 11:59:46
        The link to the thread ur started on the forum there. (NT) -- Katerina, Tue, March 29 2005, 3:16:40
        Re: The link to the thread ur started on the forum there. -- Peter van der Hoog, Tue, March 29 2005, 11:30:43
        Re: The link to the thread ur started on the forum there. -- Katerina, Wed, March 30 2005, 2:57:29
        Yes, very stupid -- Todd, Mon, March 28 2005, 22:52:42