VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4] ]
Subject: Re: 87 billion more dollars!!!


Author:
misc.
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 22:26:42 09/08/03 Mon
In reply to: Betty 's message, "87 billion more dollars!!!" on 22:00:30 09/08/03 Mon

The Moron-in-Chief Really Losing It

Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.greens, alt.politics.republicans
Date: 2003-09-07 18:59:46 PST


We already have the largest deficit in our history thanks to his
stupidity, now he wants taxpayers to shell out more for the
unilateral, unprovoked war he couldn't wait to drag us into!!!

Where are those Iraqi weapons of mass destruction anyway?

Just watch the rest of our former (again thanks to Bush) allies
sit back and laugh as this clown drags America further into
a fiscal and military morass.

If Iraqis are so happy about being "liberated" where are the
demonstrations of joy?

==============

The politics of fear have gotten out of hand and the joke is on us. It's
time folks shared the joke with the people who are going to be paying for
it. If enough folks say the Emperor has no clothes, maybelet's hope the
Bush Doctrine dies the death of a thousand cutting remarks.

==============

I was watching MSNBC just before (and during) the Presidential address. One
of the military experts referred to the Iraqi resistance fighters as "brutal
people." My immediate response was: If those people are "brutal," doesn't
it take a brutal leader to control them? - Which brings us to the question -
Did we really need to remove the brutal regime of Saddam or was it the only
kind of a government able to control that area under its current
circumstances? Attempts to superimpose our political ideals upon somebody
else's realities will only fail.

The proponents of the regime change in Iraq like to compare it with our post
WWII political role in Germany and Japan. They need to be reminded that
both Germany and Japan were among the world's technological leaders already
prior to the war. In terms of their socio-economic development they were
ready for advanced democracy even before they were defeated militarily. Not
so Iraq. Even though the area between Tigris and Euphrates had an early
start and gave birth to numerous other civilizations, it has also been
attracting hordes of invaders throughout history, each invasion throwing the
area centuries back. Our invasion will throw it only further back.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: 87 billion more dollars!!!misc.22:29:32 09/08/03 Mon
the speechBetty23:58:57 09/08/03 Mon


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.