Re: define, please, "liberal" & "conservative" W/O reference to BUSH or KERRY or political party -- robdogdotcom

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

Subject: Re: define, please, "liberal" & "conservative" W/O reference to BUSH or KERRY or political party

Author:
Jeff
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 14:06:43 06/08/04 Tue
In reply to: Rob Dog Bastard 's message, "Re: define, please, "liberal" & "conservative" W/O reference to BUSH or KERRY or political party" on 06:57:48 06/08/04 Tue

They may want a lot of the same out comes, but at the very fundamentals there are very large differances. Though since this is the US which is very pragmatic they'll find ways to make it work.

I think that is a good point that the more you figure out the way things work the more you become conservative. I'd say that would make a lot of since becuase you would need to see the value of the existing institions. The liberal wants to evolve them, which can be inprove them, but can also take away what made them work in the first place.

In the end, the liberal who gets its his or her way, may have to eventually turn conservative because there will be others that want to keep going with the change. That makes it kind of unstable, since you don't know how far it'll end up once it gets moving.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

The problem I have with liberals in general . . . Rob Dog Bastard 17:11:27 06/08/04 Tue

Re: The problem I have with labels and groupings . . . -- schilda, 04:50:31 06/09/04 Wed

Re: The problem I have with labels and groupings . . . -- Jeff, 05:34:38 06/09/04 Wed
How to dissolve the two-party system -- Rob Dog Bastard, 06:48:11 06/09/04 Wed

Re: How to dissolve the two-party system -- schilda, 18:04:09 06/09/04 Wed

Step by step. -- Rob Dog Bastard, 20:29:53 06/09/04 Wed

Re: Step by step. -- schilda, 04:59:58 06/10/04 Thu

Re: Step by step. -- Jeff, 05:37:05 06/10/04 Thu

Re: The problem I have with liberals in general . . . -- Ray, 03:15:20 06/13/04 Sun

Give me a big kiss, Ray. -- Rob Dog Bastard, 07:37:06 06/13/04 Sun

"The MOST I can get out of these people" - looks like you are the one with the problem -- Ray, 23:59:24 06/16/04 Wed