VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Thu, Apr 15 2004, 1:30:18
Author: MKIceman
Subject: Re: Previous Post
In reply to: Long Time Lurker 's message, "My Mistake" on Thu, Apr 15 2004, 1:16:58

>Oops. My mistake. I didn't notice the lazy smilie in
>your sentence which turned it from a crude put-down to
>a gentle bon mot.
>
>"You mean, a bit ingratiating? Or testicle-licking? ;)
>I know that I am not the only one to think so, but I
>can see that I am the only one bold enough to say it.
>Honestly, I don't know how poor Heywood can go to the
>bathroom with so many people hanging from his balls."

Does everyone think that me calling his "worshippers" as suck-ups or, more descriptively, testicle-lickers (both referring to the same thing) is the same as me insulting him? I thought I was insulting them, not him. ::confused::

Does no one else think "sucking up" (derived from the sexual act of sucking dick) means worshipping?

Does no one else see that that thread was originally devoted to arguing about trollery and, then, flames (which were brought up by the fact that Heywood is known for posting well-written flames)?

The fact that he misconstrued this as an attack on him only proves the "The Heywood Show" (i.e., "It's all about me!") aspect of my argument in this thread.

>Anyway, I think we agree on the major point--more
>snarking around the campfire, less using GAFF as the
>staging area for attacks on authors off-site.

We do.

--Matt

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:





Forum timezone: GMT-3
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.