VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Sun, Nov 16 2003, 0:37:48
Author: KJ
Subject: fuck you Squirrelly you dont know what you are talking about
In reply to: Squirrelly, former court clerk, current court reporter 's message, "Let me give you a little legal advice of my own..." on Sat, Nov 15 2003, 22:49:44

>>DUE TO YOUR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH MY PREVIOUS REQUEST
>>I WILL NOW SERVE YOU WITH A SUBPEONA. IF YOU DO NOT
>>RESPOND YOU WILL BE ARRESTED.
>
>Pffft. I work in court, "Mr. Wong, Esq." and you are
>completely full of crap.
>
>For one thing, none of us are stupid enough to think
>that a real attorney is posting a subpoena on an
>internet message board. Legal papers of that nature
>(subpoenas, warrants, show-cause summonses etc.) are
>not legally binding until ordered by a judge in a
>court of law. Nor are they enforceable unless served
>by an officer of the court to the party in question.
>
>Furthermore, you have no jurisdiction over this
>website, so you can subpoena us all you want and it
>won't make a bit of difference. Good luck, since you
>don't have our home addresses, and there's no way to
>serve them. Subpoenas always require a last known
>address.
>
>Also, if we are being implicated in a pending case,
>you are legally required to inform us of the specific
>charges, the case number, the address of the
>courthouse where the charges have been filed, the next
>court date, and the true name of the accuser. So no
>more hiding behind a troll name.
>
>Lastly, do you even know what a subpoena is for? It's
>an order for a person to appear in court on a certain
>day to testify. It's generally used for witnesses in a
>trial, but almost never used for the defendants. So
>are we witnesses to the heinous crime of linking, or
>what?
>
>>YOU ARE ORDERED TO RETURN THE HAIKUS AT ONCE.
>
>We don't have them, sorry. We do have a lovely link to
>them, but no physical possession. The law is
>explicitly on our side here.
>
>>YOU ARE FURTHER ORDERED TO STOP MAKING FUN OF MY
>>CLIENT KJ.
>
>Ordered? Since when does a lawyer issue orders? Judges
>issue orders, and nobody else. Your "orders" are
>worthless. Also, the U.S. Constitution (the country in
>which KJ lives) clearly upholds the First Amendment
>right to freedom of speech. Sorry, you're just out of
>luck on that one, since we can say pretty much
>whatever we want about you.
>
>Not only that, but it is illegal to practice law with
>a license. After a thorough search online, I was
>absolutely stunned and amazed to find that there is
>not a single registered attorney in the United States
>named Gerardo Wong.
>
>If we ever find out your real name (and just wait
>until the JCMB admins email us back with your ISP),
>then you can be held legally liable for the felony
>charge of attempting to pass yourself off as a lawyer.
>
>So let me give *you* a little legal advice now. Back
>off and quick trolling out board. You've been a real
>pain in the ass here. If you persist in harassing the
>regulars on this board, then when I find out your real
>name, you had better believe that I *will* call the
>court closest to where you live and tip off the local
>District Attorney about your shenanigans. I doubt that
>s/he will be amused.
>
>>GERALDO WONG, ESQ.
>
>And by the way, troll, you might have picked a more
>original name for your sock puppet lawyer. The actor
>who plays Ensign Harry Kim on Voyager is named Garrett
>Wang (pronounced Wong). You've got to be kidding me.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Forum timezone: GMT-3
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.