VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]345678910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:59:19 06/07/02 Fri
Author: OMP
Author Host/IP: 193.133.143.241
Subject: Neutral? Oh, I see. That must have been a Faroe Islands flag you posted yesterday then.
In reply to: Marlowe 's message, "Some points from a neutral." on 15:42:52 06/07/02 Fri


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> [> You want me to be critical? Okay. England were dire and unimaginative for 45 minutes against Sweden, and played in a similar fashion for a similar time against Argentina. The only difference today was that no England defender ballsed up to give the opposition an equaliser. -- Marlowe, 16:05:19 06/07/02 Fri (217.35.23.95)


[ Edit | View ]



[> [> [> Aha! So you are an England fan after all then. -- OMP, 16:07:04 06/07/02 Fri (193.133.143.241)


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> What a sack of wank! We were great, deal with it! -- N&N, 16:07:07 06/07/02 Fri (172.181.22.61)


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> "sack of wank"? -- Blakey, 16:20:08 06/07/02 Fri (207.170.57.5)


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Good analysis up top, but a bit harsh there I reckon. The Argies were on top for 20 minutes rather than 45 and I think it was understandable that leading 1-0 against one of the best sides in the World we didn't pour forward with carefree abandon. More a clever tactical change than poor play on Englands part I reckon. -- Jesus Quintana, 16:12:46 06/07/02 Fri (195.92.168.171)


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> I was being hyper-critical. I thought that a lot of England in the second half, bar one move for Sheringhams volley was similar to the first half against Sweden. The first 20-25 minutes, England were defending far too deep for that stage and Argentina were the better side, England were far and away the better side in the next 40 minutes or so and I thought were deserving of their lead. The 4 defenders and the keeper didn't make a single mistake all game, so deservedly won the game. Fair play to you all, its a million and one miles away from anything that we could ever do internationally. -- Marlowe, 16:19:14 06/07/02 Fri (217.35.23.95)


[ Edit | View ]











Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.