"王甫"問題 -- 關麗珊作品

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Wednesday, May 13, 4:54:57 [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18/12/04 3:48
Author: Baboon
Subject: "王甫"問題

再談"王甫"問題。"甫"字讀音容或有爭議，下文再說，首先談一談寫法。我向無線投訴多次，終於有一小姐回覆，謂編劇認識一名使用該複姓之人，其人稱他們已簡化"皇甫"為"王甫"；這根本是胡說八道！姓氏不是私人財產，而是社會公用，不能隨意亂改；再者，大家知道，雖然"皇"與"王"在粵語是同音，但在普通話則分別是"Huang"和"Wang"。簡化這樣"大件事"，怎會無聲無息便改了？這狡辯我絕不接受，不過無線錯了不認，則可以理解，畢竟認錯雖要勇氣。

至於讀音，嘉君堅持"甫"是讀"普"，根據是唐代沒有"fu"音。嘉君博學，可能是受了清學者錢大昕影響。錢大昕考證出"古無輕脣音"，即無現代之"f"音，此觀點亦廣為學界接受。不過要注意的是語音演變的問題，錢氏之謂古，乃先秦兩漢時代之上古音；而以隋唐時之中古音而論，誠然，隋朝之《切韻》尚未出現輕脣音，但至唐宋間出現之三十六字母，"非敷奉微"四輕脣聲紐已經從"幫滂並明"四重脣音分出，由此可見，"f"音之出現，是約在唐宋間。故此，我不能肯定唐人不能讀"f"音，還請嘉君不吝賜教。另外，要是"甫"字在唐朝只讀"普"，因唐朝無"f"音的話，則在唐朝，"父親"可能讀作"pu 親"，"非常"可能讀作"悲常"，"入不敷支"可能讀作"入不 bu 支"。嘉君要把"甫"字復古讀唐音，那麼，"父"、"非"、"敷"等字又須不須要復古呢？查工具書，"皇甫"本是"皇父"，那麼，即使"父"字在唐代是讀"pu"，現代也已讀"府"(如"師父")，"甫"字是不是也應該跟著讀"府"呢？

"甫"字，黃錫凌先生的《粵音韻彙》"普""府"兩音皆收，但無注明用法；何文匯博士等編之《粵音正讀字彙》則只收"府"音。本人學識不多，很希望有識之士能夠解決這疑問，更希望傳媒能夠謹慎一些，不要誤導大眾。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: "王甫"問題 -- P, 18/12/04 11:25
- Re: "王甫"問題 -- 璟, 19/12/04 2:18
  - 甫 -- P, 19/12/04 12:40
    - Re: 甫 -- 璟, 19/12/04 16:23
Re: "王甫"問題 -- Baboon, 18/12/04 14:47
Re: "王甫"問題 -- 璟, 19/12/04 2:34
- Re: "王甫"問題 -- Baboon, 19/12/04 16:46
  - Re: "王甫"問題 -- 日日是好日, 1/01/05 10:08
    - Re: "王甫"問題 -- Baboon, 1/01/05 19:09

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.