<B>Hey, Tat - (and every other gal in this topic).......I so get what you are saying, girl!! You have hit every point on the new - and the old, for sure - pregnancies on the show. As you know, I was watching back then when Meg fell and lost her baby. There was NO hysterectomy. It was a rough miscarriage - and the doctors told her it would be very difficult to conceive - NOT impossible. Don't know where the trolls are getting their history info. Extremely difficult does not equal "impossible." I am also rooting for Meg to be pregnant with PAUL'S child - a child from their love for each other. Besides, it's time that Paul had a child, and with a woman he is IN LOVE with to top it off! And man, do I hear ya' about the nut-job and her pregnancy with Paul's child....She alone (for several reasons and actions) is responsible for killing Paul's baby. (And lordy her whoring @ss is coming back on screen this week

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:44:24 10/21/07 Sun
Author: TK
Subject: Hey, Tat - (and every other gal in this topic).......I so get what you are saying, girl!! You have hit every point on the new - and the old, for sure - pregnancies on the show. As you know, I was watching back then when Meg fell and lost her baby. There was NO hysterectomy. It was a rough miscarriage - and the doctors told her it would be very difficult to conceive - NOT impossible. Don't know where the trolls are getting their history info. Extremely difficult does not equal "impossible." I am also rooting for Meg to be pregnant with PAUL'S child - a child from their love for each other. Besides, it's time that Paul had a child, and with a woman he is IN LOVE with to top it off! And man, do I hear ya' about the nut-job and her pregnancy with Paul's child....She alone (for several reasons and actions) is responsible for killing Paul's baby. (And lordy her whoring @ss is coming back on screen this week - GAG!!)
In reply to: tat statler 's message, "Let's talk about babies ...
" on 08:05:57 10/21/07 Sun

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

And yep! Paul (and Meg, for that matter) has more than suffered for his 'sins' ....Keep fighting Paul! I KNOW you can win this time! And thanks, Tat! THIS ROCKS!! (NT) -- TK, 23:48:18 10/21/07 Sun
It is hilarious watching them hanging on to "Meg CAN'T get pregnant!!!" It's like a drowning person reaching for a life preserver (or in this case a death hoo doo ... hee!). We know the real reason why they are NOW such huge "History" pundits. Heh. What's even more ridiculous is that in RL women are told that they can't conceive or bear ... but whoooops! Doctors were wrong. One of my cousins is proof of this. Of course we all tell her (constantly!) that she is going against "History". SNICKER! (NT) -- tat, 05:14:39 10/22/07 Mon

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.