Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ] |
They just better not use Paul's son as a plot point. Babies are not bargaining chips. I had my fill of that atrocity with Emily ... I do NOT want to see it replicated with Craig. No, I don't.
Perpetual optimist that I am, however, it seems to me that in keeping with Soap 101 ... Paul's son will survive and thrive. Paul needs children. Every other Male Scion of Oakdale has children except for Paul. Not right ... not Soapy.
In reply to:
cataz
's message, "Hey Tat -- Good to have you checking in and bringing us your wit & wisdom! I've missed it so, You're Right-on-Mark, with everything you said, IMO!! :) Goodbye Cady & Grayson, best of luck to ya both!! Now, On with the Show!!! MORE PAUL TV, Please, Santa, PLEASE!! Ditto, too, Tat regarding Scott Bryce. I'm worried about that baby tho, I don't like TPTB playing all these games with the innocense of a child and hope & pray he's got plenty of his daddy's gene's and will pull through all this drama! Hang on Baby Ryan!!!! :)" on 06:28:01 12/13/07 Thu
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
On another note -- did you see Cady's new blog? Gee, they didn't give her a cake, but Grayson got one.... boo-hoo, pout. Sad to hear production people were cut,, but the show will go on. I wish ATWT all the luck in the world for 2008 and am thankful we get to have Roger's Paul!! He's just so yummy! (NT)
-- cataz, 15:12:10 12/14/07 Fri
Forum timezone: GMT-8 VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB: Before posting please read our privacy policy. VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems. Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved. |