<B>What a difference they are showing with Meg as a caring mother, putting her child first no matter who the daddy, versus Emily, the crazy lunatic using her baby for her own benefits. This child is being loved by it's mama and true papa, eventho Paul believe's he belongs to another. <p> On another note -- did you see Cady's new blog? Gee, they didn't give her a cake, but Grayson got one.... boo-hoo, pout. Sad to hear production people were cut,, but the show will go on. I wish ATWT all the luck in the world for 2008 and am thankful we get to have Roger's Paul!! He's just so yummy! </b> -- TODD'S LAIR

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:12:10 12/14/07 Fri
Author: cataz
Subject: What a difference they are showing with Meg as a caring mother, putting her child first no matter who the daddy, versus Emily, the crazy lunatic using her baby for her own benefits. This child is being loved by it's mama and true papa, eventho Paul believe's he belongs to another.

On another note -- did you see Cady's new blog? Gee, they didn't give her a cake, but Grayson got one.... boo-hoo, pout. Sad to hear production people were cut,, but the show will go on. I wish ATWT all the luck in the world for 2008 and am thankful we get to have Roger's Paul!! He's just so yummy!
In reply to: tat 's message, "Oh, Cataz! I hear ya about Paul's son ... sob. I really hate baby in jeopardy stories. You remember how I screamed when Emily had that untested experiment done on Paul's baby's brain ... to get out of jail! I suspected then that that baby was just a plot point to redeem Emily. And I was right. So sad. Paul's daughter.

They just better not use Paul's son as a plot point. Babies are not bargaining chips. I had my fill of that atrocity with Emily ... I do NOT want to see it replicated with Craig. No, I don't.

Perpetual optimist that I am, however, it seems to me that in keeping with Soap 101 ... Paul's son will survive and thrive. Paul needs children. Every other Male Scion of Oakdale has children except for Paul. Not right ... not Soapy." on 04:22:21 12/14/07 Fri

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

I so agree, it is a "World" of difference, Cataz! Meg and Paul warm my heart. Emily was a monster to use Paul's daughter the way she did, not only to get out of jail ... but to also manipulate Paul. I'm still worried about the Craig factor though. Spoilers indicate that he doesn't go through with killing the baby but the Story isn't over ... Craig could still put the baby at risk again.
I'm so sad about the cuts, too. PGP was serious about the measures they are taking to keep the Show on the air. BUT! It's Christmas ... wahhhhhh! So heartbreaking. (NT) -- tat, 15:55:11 12/14/07 Fri
Yeah, a big boohoo to Ms. McClain. What a passive-aggressive little git. But ... that wasn't what really fried me. That link she's talking about further down goes to an old Richard Serra piece. It is basically art propaganda from back in the "The Medium is the Massage" days of the 70's. Bottom line? She's calling us idiots for watching the Show. I don't know what that makes her because she's bounced around soap for decades ... and I'm not buying her mealy mouthed disclaimer. If she thinks people who watch TV are witless morons who are tools of consumer manipulation ... maybe she better stop working in TV, huh? Because she has been a part of that so-called consumer manipulation. AND she was getting paid to do it. She's all agog over an old political art piece? I'm all aghast at her hypocrisy. (NT) -- tat, 16:06:15 12/14/07 Fri

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.