another GHMB AOM -- The MB of Ian Alex Blease

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Sat, May 16 2026, 10:29:20 [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, [9], 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07:52:33 04/03/08 Thu
Author: warwick
Author Host/IP: px3cv.gv.shawcable.net / 24.64.223.205
Subject:

another GHMB AOM

this month it's Schoch. after a month of Jaws' vitriolic defence of what he thinks is correct...which included him completely dismissing Salt exfioliation OUT OF HAND...I took the opportunity to ask the following of Schoch..

http://www.grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?f=8&i=7722&t=7722

No reply, not even lurkers, nada, nothing.

What the hell is going on?? has this guy studied the Sphinx or has he not? Has he authored two books which deal with the Sphinx or has he not?
Or has he, in fact been rubber stamping JAWS's work ?

I have never heard him personally claim to have had his theory universally accepted at the AGO presentation, only Steve saying so and Jaws saying that he personally talked to everyone in the room for 3 1/2 minutes each, and that they all accepted the threory as the most likely scenario. What I believe really happened is that nobody said much of anything either way and that the opportunity was taken to spin the LACK of criticism into Overwhelming acceptance.

I very much doubt that Schoch is willing to discuss salt exfioliation ex tempore with anyone, let alone another lettered geologist. Now I know why Jaws is so diligent in deflecting discussions on same.

They KNOW that they have enfiladed the Salt Exfioliation issue and neither of them has the proffessional integrity to back track and deal with same, while at the same time villifying Archae Solenhofen, and anyone else who broaches the subject.

They do NOT wish to know the age of the Sphinx . They wish to be seen as those who discovered the age of the Sphinx...they wish to continue marketing their New Age ClapTrap to all those lost souls that long for it, the same people that long to see anyone better off then them or better educated than them fall on their face.
The idea that little bare footed 4th Dynasty AE's sculpted the Sphinx does not fit with Parapsychology, Lost Civilisations or the marketing of spiritual awakening.

Perhaps by ranting here I'll be able to goad Schoch's HANDLERS into advising him to make some sort of responce. Rather than absolutely no responce to a proffessionally phrased and politely presented straight forward question

as allways ...I am more than prepared to be prooven completely wrong on this. I do not care about being seen as the Bright light....I just want the major players to play nice.

warwick

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: another GHMB AOM -- Ian, 08:11:43 04/03/08 Thu
Re: another GHMB AOM -- Ian, 08:13:41 04/03/08 Thu
- Re: another GHMB AOM -- JC, 09:16:43 04/03/08 Thu
  - Re: another GHMB AOM -- warwick, 11:49:53 04/03/08 Thu
    - Re: another GHMB AOM -- JC, 12:56:29 04/03/08 Thu
      - Re: another GHMB AOM -- warwick, 08:34:27 04/04/08 Fri
        Re: another GHMB AOM -- JC, 10:21:57 04/04/08 Fri
        easy as cake -- Warwick, 10:50:46 04/04/08 Fri
        Re: easy as cake -- JC, 12:50:00 04/04/08 Fri
        Re: easy as cake -- Ian, 05:36:10 04/05/08 Sat
        Re: easy as cake -- warwick, 08:37:07 04/05/08 Sat
        and of course -- warwick, 08:38:35 04/05/08 Sat
        Re: and of course -- JC, 09:25:30 04/05/08 Sat
        Re: and of course -- warwick, 11:39:54 04/05/08 Sat
        Re: and of course (NT) -- warwick, 11:40:21 04/05/08 Sat
        Re: and of course -- JC, 12:21:59 04/05/08 Sat
Not to burst your bubble -- Steve, 13:06:00 04/03/08 Thu
Incidentally... -- Steve, 17:15:56 04/03/08 Thu
- Re: Incidentally... -- warwick, 08:06:56 04/04/08 Fri
Re: another GHMB AOM -- warwick, 09:09:25 04/04/08 Fri
Re: another GHMB AOM -- Steve, 13:06:09 04/04/08 Fri
- Re: another GHMB AOM -- warwick, 08:53:09 04/05/08 Sat
  - and please -- Warwick, 11:26:13 04/05/08 Sat
and here's another thought -- warwick, 10:22:41 04/07/08 Mon