VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Tuesday, May 28, 16:20:12Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456[7]89 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:55:43 10/15/07 Mon
Author: susiej
Subject: hmm, very interesting as your posts always are. I asked you this once already but don't know if you saw it or just prefer to keep your privacy, so I'll ask again. Are you a history professor or teacher? As for your point, I will have to disagree somewhat- there are bigger differences than I realized (which is not surprising since i don't know the whole story) however, I still do see a big similarity in singling yourself out in the eyes of a crowd, particularly a crowd gathered in the street to see violence done. It is a much bigger risk than what Jamie did with Beardsly and both Jamie and John risked not only the normal rankling of a crowd and being associated with "criminal" but exposure of things they would wish to keep secret. Then there's the whole calling out and the act of compassion to one who is left with so little, one who others can so easily ignore. And thanks to all of you for taking my criticism so well and answering it even better.
In reply to: maddiej 's message, "The only similarity I see is the "witnessing" of death by hanging. John actually doesn't do this out of compassion; Bates blackmailed him. (He could have not showed up, but as Bates noted, "officer and gentleman". He gave his word, so he'll go.) He's in no danger of being suspected as a sodomite--until he makes that instinctive gesture to end Bates's suffering. I think *that* is a really major difference. He comes reluctantly, and has no deep feeling for Bates (while Jamie was Gavin Hayes "chief," as well as his friend). But he can't let Bates strangle in front of him. He doesn't think anything about "fellow officer" or "there but for the grace of God go I", nor does he think for an instant about his own safety. He just does what has to be done. Jamie is fulfilling his social obligations to Gavin; John is showing instinctive mercy to a stranger. I think the parallel is actually stronger with Jamie's actions toward Aaron Beardsley." on 11:05:21 10/15/07 Mon


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:





[ Contact Forum Admin ]




Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.