| Subject: The oath issue 燊黺蕾楊岉啅 |
Author:
з￣
[ Edit | View ]
|
Date Posted: 14:56:00 09/24/04 Fri
I am fine with whatever oath Long Hair takes, so long as it is according to his conscience. Long Hair shouldn't drag on over this. Just pass the ball to the Tung's government, the Chinese officials, octogenarian fiends like Tsang Hin Tze and lackeys like DAB etc. Long Hair＊s job is to expose the hegemonic nature, stupidity, unreasonableness and injustice of the establishment. And to make all those ※oxen, ghosts, snakes, gods§ embarrassed. (Just now the Secretary of Justice has stupidly said that Legco members should take the official oath as a show of "uniformity". Cadre from the Liaison Office, Li Gang, followed and made a similar threat.) Fear not, comrades! For it is fear that make our soul and courage perish. Let＊s not fear, comrades! They are but ※paper tigers§. I think Long Hair supporters wouldn't care much about the oath. We all want him to be there in the Legco. Long Hair is the one among the few who dare to play politics with the CCP, with Tung, with the unscrupulous capitalist land lords and money lords. He dare to test the limits of so many things that we have taken for granted. Hong Kong politics and political culture desperately need someones who dare to misbehave and disobey, to tell the truth, to let conscience take reign! We may not need revolution (though my inner anarchistic ghost has caused me to get more and more inclined to anti-establishment guys and I think many of the so-called educated middle class like us share the same sentiments). But we do need room, space and freedom to rethink about the established rules and challenge the limits: who set these? why so? what meaning? how nonsense? what alternatives? etc. Comrades, This place is our place! This time is our time!
Having said that, let's not treat Long Hair as an idol or even God. He certainly is no saviour for Hong Kong. I think Long Hair wouldn＊t desire the same, too. He is just human being, homo sapiens with bone and flesh and, I trust, a good soul that many in the vanity fair don't have. I found Chan Ya's article in Apple Daily quite readable. It is hypocrisy and nuisance free! (c.f. property speculator Sze, who claimed to be once a Marxist with better theoretical knowledge). I here attach. Happy reading.
妱彆 珩
2004-09-23
墿禱腢ㄛ綺閤傖鷖漆甚媢熆奀臛芊墿禱俶祥岆餫螹逯ㄛ醱n腕掀鼠挌恄遘葃僆腕嗣腔鷖偰ㄛ網柲褣轎嬪褣ㄛ耨U腢摽掩つＧ禜珨邅鞢
氪祥岆鋤@陝皎ㄛ祥蚚棉諳緊墿禱ㄛ筍S卍黺眸餫袙荌ㄛ炰g苤觳湮釬﹝鋤@陝皎晟猁媊聜界郈奿騞銊腦鷖課斕嫖喭﹜阼斕匏ㄛ坋墿禱飲虓渤g眳薯﹝墿禱祥岆泬控縑ㄛ泬屾婓嬴虛c髡rㄛ紨袚偰善穔鼯氪ㄛ覂刲禍籣氪褩騿屾掛伎ㄛ珨陳﹝墿禱祥岆衄嫶豝ㄛ祥岆鼠赽堤旯ㄛ湖ぐ誰螹T賸ㄛ雅腕汜湔軗弇ㄛ綺蜻ace off趙旯泬屾郲腔褫夔俶ㄛむ竭腴﹝硐岆ㄛ侜糧鶱喭鷓悈鷖蔔賸sometimes naive眳俋ㄛ衄r竭①髯趙ㄛ請斕ど誰ㄛ斕憩腕笮婓坻票离疑腔蓿々奻ㄛど誰疚驉
蝜斕岆墿禱腔荽T翑燴ㄛ斕杸墿禱詻詻佷砑馱釬ㄛз庥恉r眳狟ㄛ稷曳閡匊v棉諳﹝傛笢硌腔荽Tㄛ蕾楊眒衄珨ㄛ墿禱o牼﹝殍嘉A嶺Tee鄙^鴦援ㄛ筍e珨陳蜓惸憩參R誰彶w菁ㄛ陰霜變矛I560啋珨璃腔agn b.﹝豝埱遛奿堀憌玻８湮Е銘шt埏ㄛ筍喲腔朸B猁蛁砩ㄛ猁笒輪翌跦腔尪湮檗ㄛ罫褩釬伄玄玒ook腔夥源禱翋炟睿苤す黯桽饒意訬B﹝嬴勘桽o溥ㄛ筍鞠侐勘爛菁眢翋眕摽ㄛ憩腕苤陑腢魋鞂_ねc﹝笢虐躲|搛復S衄僇擒褩ㄛ筍帗屢溶蕦誰鵁穔儸W腦ㄛ蕦r岆請斕佶鮿おa腔S寶褧擁﹝祥斛紱陑腔給岆珨螹墿禱ㄛ假黺政蹌芮瓊炬閡W☆貊貊★ㄛ綎爺湖燴ㄛ毀奧侔鹹啁躓娊腔蘆恅庰﹝
|
|
Feedback: 
長征論壇