Couple of things -- Clatsop County Matters

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

04/18/26 12:51pm

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4 ]

Subject: Couple of things

Author:
yes you are

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09/ 4/06 12:01pm
In reply to: nucking futz 's message, "you too" on 09/ 3/06 12:41pm

There are a few problems with your post. One that sticks out like a sore thumb is your choice of the word "immediate" as far as when the fish get released back into the water. In whose book is 4 hours, Yes, 4 hours considered immediate. Not in anybodys I know (except for fishermen). I would think an "immediate" release would be within half an hour of catching(at least) for best chance of fish survival. There is the other problem with the net, oh, but that's just a minor thing.

I would agree that in your first paragraph, it appears that person is being harrassed or targeted.

So people shouldn't follow the law at all. Instead of trying to change the law, let's just not follow it. Where does that stop? Apparently it doesn't. Let's just say that a law enforcement officer needs to get a warrant to board a fishing boat, where is he going to find one before the fisherman FINALLY dumps the illegal fish overboard. Maybe we need to start paying for judges to be out on boats, so that the enforcement agents can pull up to his boat and get a warrant and then go serve it. Better yet, screw it, everyone knows that fishermen are all the honest type. Yeah, right!! We should just do away with all fish and wildlife guys. In this case it's just like a vehicle on the road, and gets treated the same. No warrant needed.

If you don't do anything wrong, you wouldn't need to worry about fish and wildlife guys.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
4th Ammendment, ever heard of it? Since we are all innocent why bother having a constitution?	Legal Minded	09/ 4/06 3:24pm
Partial correction ... -- Walter Richards, 09/ 7/06 9:58am Understand your point however -- Grossman, 09/ 7/06 8:14pm Perhaps it's viewed differently, because ... -- Walter Richards, 09/ 8/06 7:07am