Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

Subject: Three things stand out to me: 1) A great, clean website with good branding/good royalty photos and lots of information. 2) Good production in a theater, not on a one-foot-tall stage in a little ballroom lit with fluorescent ceiling lights. 3) Less categories. I understand the desire to make more crowns available in an attempt to get more contestants, but honestly it only ends up cheapening the competition. Mrs. America, International, and United States have one national winner, not a winner for every five years of age, every two inches of height, etc. Keep it prestigious. Author: Food for thought [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 03/04/14 Tue In reply to: Kelly 's message, "Several really great pageants out there nice directors too! My question some say they need to be on a higher caliber what would you like to see done or fixed to get it on that level ? To get those who feel some smaller pageants are not good enough for them. I must add everyone runs for the big so called 3 but, what makes them higher caliber?" on 03/04/14 Tue [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date you pretty much said it. Fabulous venue, quality women who are vying for one crown, great schedule, and a web site anyone would be proud to show off. Most can't do all that and don't even try. (NT) so, the big 3 does it. That's the difference. 03/05/14 Wed Re: Three things stand out to me: 1) A great, clean website with good branding/good royalty photos and lots of information. 2) Good production in a theater, not on a one-foot-tall stage in a little ballroom lit with fluorescent ceiling lights. 3) Less categories. I understand the desire to make more crowns available in an attempt to get more contestants, but honestly it only ends up cheapening the competition. Mrs. America, International, and United States have one national winner, not a winner for every five years of age, every two inches of height, etc. Keep it prestigious. Mrs. Fan (Disappointed) 04/05/14 Sat However, the title is "Mrs. America", which helps a lot. (NT) -- ., 04/05/14 Sat and that's the one reason it's still around (NT) -- the name, 04/18/14 Fri