VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:07:42 11/15/25 Sat
Author: More inside for Scott.
Subject: You are more than welcome. But it is you that needs to double check their facts.
In reply to: SCOTT CORDON - MORE INSIDE 's message, "Thank you for your concern but maybe get your facts correct first" on 07:08:38 11/15/25 Sat

Firstly, lets clear up the most basic error:
I am not the person who called you a keyboard warrior, so if thats the basis of your IP tracking confidence, you may want to double check whatever information you think you have. Starting with a false assumption undermines everything else you have claimed.

Secondly, congratulations on contacting the police, if you actually did. It is good to see you finally following the correct process and doing the right thing.

Third, you keep demanding one piece of evidence, yet you also insist this is now a police matter. Since you want it handled professionally, then let the professionals deal with it. What is already clear is this:
Details have been posted on Voy that only people inside your school, and specifically teachers, would know. Whether you want to accept it or not, that is why people have concluded Elizabeth has been posting. Multiple people have shown it is her posting here. That is not fabrication, that is pattern, context, and consistency. You are free to defend your colleague, but you cannot call the accusation baseless when the behaviour has already been demonstrated multiple times. You cannot confidently say it was not her posting either if you do not have the evidence otherwise. But as stated, let us leave that to the professionals, they will tell us who is really posting.

You also accuse people of attacking you, yet on this very recent thread, people were actually defending you. It was wrong to mention your name in such a serious situation but if attaching yourself to posts with serious allegations is what you want associated with your brand, that is entirely your choice.

Regarding the old posts you referenced:
Constantly bringing them up actually proves your , or the parents in your schools, usage of Voy, which contradicts what you have tried to imply. And to clarify:
The post calling someone fat was not about you at all , it was in fact disgustingly aimed at a dancers who apparently competed that weekend,
it was not directed at your school, and absolutely did not say YOU put dancers on diets. So in fact, it is you that is twisting the narrative to support your victim mentality, the post was not about you and I know this I even reported that thread myself because it was disturbing, especially as it was about a dancer and children but again, the posters claimed to be from WIDA, not CNRG or your school. Why on earth would you relate it back to your school when all posters supposedly came from two other orgs.
So unless you have inside information tying that thread to your school, your attempt to link it back to yourself makes no sense.

Finally, nobody has EVER claimed that you or Elizabeth are moderators of the voy board so I am not sure where you have got that information from.
The issue is that Elizabeth happily posts about others and escalates situations, until someone defends themselves. At that point, she suddenly wants the actual moderator to remove everything before she is held accountable. That is the behaviour being discussed.
You do not moderate the board, but you have absolutely appeared to filter or report posts that expose her behaviour.

If you want to defend your colleague, do so but do not rewrite events, do not misquote people, and do not accuse others of fabrications while ignoring the evidence that has already been demonstrated.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
 * HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.