Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct:
Feedback:
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
|
| Subject: And that's fine - let her win because she's tops in 3/4 categories. But the categories should be judged without bringing non-relevant considerations to bear. I liked what SC did - she was fun and a good performer. She was not the best talent. | |
Author: No name | [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] Date Posted: Thu June 20, 2024 23:44:01 In reply to: 's message, "Hannah has been a great national titleholder but unfortunately her talent was nowhere near as advanced or technical as some of the other girls who competed with her last year." on Thu June 20, 2024 22:27:52 [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| [> [> [> [> [> Subject: One misconception about talent is it’s only based on talent. No, it’s not. It’s based on performance and entertainment value. Hence why NE was the most talented on that stage, but playing instruments is naturally harder to have the same entertainment value as a song or dance because it’s more difficult to connect to the audience when you need to watch your fingers. Singers and dancers mostly win in pageantry because the art form is most likely to connect to an audience. Based purely on talent, NE should have won. Adding the performance and entertainment value, it was a toss up between NE, NC, and CO | |
|
Author: No name [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: Thu June 20, 2024 23:55:54 [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |
|
Forum timezone: GMT-5 VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB: Before posting please read our privacy policy. VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems. Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved. |