Now Why Did NG Change The Swing? -- Natural Golfers' Support Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:05:14 02/26/02 Tue
Author: HH
Subject: Now Why Did NG Change The Swing?
In reply to: Chazman 's message, "Curtis Strange validates the old NG and BGG swings." on 18:38:57 02/23/02 Sat

Chaz been following your postings on BGG and NG for a while now and I guess the question that I keep coming back to is WHY? Why did NG change the swing so fundamentally. I learned NG from their LOBG package never took a lesson - I found I did not need it. The package was in my opinion that good. I can only guess that the marketing people at NG have seized the ship as well as the crew. Personally and it is only speculation on my part the deliberate blurring of CG and NG SA golf was done deliberately to increase the acceptability of CG players to some sort of SA swing. The only problem I have with that concept is that when you hybridize - heaven help you as to what you may get! Another Frankenstein?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Now Why Did NG Change The Swing? My take! -- Chazman, 14:13:22 02/27/02 Wed
- Good Point! -- HH, 16:10:35 02/27/02 Wed
- Lead elbow collapse???! -- Jim, 09:23:00 03/01/02 Fri
  - You better check out the NG magazine Jan/Feb -- Chazman, 20:41:29 03/01/02 Fri
    - P.S I did try it out before, it was called IMA! -- Chazman, 20:45:05 03/01/02 Fri
    - Your statement is incorrect -- Jim, 09:09:29 03/02/02 Sat
      - Jim better start frame counting, better start frame counting -- Remington, 09:38:57 03/02/02 Sat
        It does not rotate because..... -- Jim, 10:57:17 03/02/02 Sat
        Let's get down to the facts...bring on the video -- Remington, 11:31:23 03/02/02 Sat
        Re: Let's get down to the facts...bring on the video -- Jim, 11:39:44 03/02/02 Sat
        Jim I don't know where to go with you on this subject -- Remington, 13:04:32 03/02/02 Sat
        Insults won't do it -- Jim, 15:12:46 03/02/02 Sat
        Again, I don't know where to go with on this subject -- Remington, 16:27:10 03/02/02 Sat
        Your talk is very fuzzy.... -- Jim, 17:22:46 03/02/02 Sat
        I think Jim would deny that the sun rises -- Chazman, 19:57:19 03/02/02 Sat
        Clear cut??? What a joke!!!! (NT) -- Jim, 20:29:25 03/02/02 Sat
        Do the forearms rotate Jim? See for yourself. -- Remington, 10:53:51 03/03/02 Sun
        Forearms do rotate, just not at the...... -- Jim, 16:14:08 03/03/02 Sun
        Jim you can't have it both ways -- Shadow, 20:24:16 03/03/02 Sun
        Moe does hit the right arm -- Jim, 01:20:14 03/04/02 Mon
        Jim, you are a hoot! -- Chazman, 11:43:51 03/04/02 Mon

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.