Re: Gee Natty, no comment on the bogus patent usage?? -- Natural Golfers' Support Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:42:51 03/22/01 Thu
Author: Ben
Subject: Re: Gee Natty, no comment on the bogus patent usage??
In reply to: Chazman 's message, "Re: Gee Natty, no comment on the bogus patent usage??" on 10:39:49 03/22/01 Thu

Ok, I am curious now. Who is guilty of fradulent advertisment? When were they convicted? If they are not currently being charged for fradulent advertisment when will someone step fwd with the proof that they indeed are advertising Fradulently? Or is this just pure speculation? I am a strong advocate of obeying the law and don't associate with a a company that knowingly breaks the law. However, I am aware that sometimes people speculate that there is a crime being committed but really have no proof so then it becomes just one persons speculation. Which is the case here?

Ben

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Gee Natty, no comment on the bogus patent usage?? -- Heavy Jumbo, 16:23:23 03/22/01 Thu
Ben, a question? -- Chazman, 00:52:21 03/23/01 Fri
- Re: Ben, a question? -- Dick DeGrifix, 09:28:01 03/23/01 Fri
  - Dick I don't understand ..... -- Bobman, 10:04:02 03/23/01 Fri
    - THE PATENT HAS BEEN CHANGED -- Dave Brown, 18:16:21 03/23/01 Fri
      - Re: It has been changed! -- Chazman, 18:50:54 03/23/01 Fri
  - Attention Chazman -- Cheese, 06:20:23 04/05/01 Thu
    - Re: Attention Chazman -- Chazman, 21:08:42 04/06/01 Fri
      - Re: Attention Chazman -- Cheese, 08:31:50 04/08/01 Sun
        Re: I have NEVER gotten any money back from NG!! -- Chazman, 10:28:31 04/08/01 Sun
        Check your records, refresh your memory, admit you are a weasel -- Cheese, 11:48:58 04/08/01 Sun
        Re: Really? Why don't you enlighten us then? -- Chazman, 23:37:13 04/08/01 Sun
        You don't know?? -- Don, 22:39:21 05/06/01 Sun
        Re: You don't know?? Yes I do! -- Chazman (the real one!), 23:33:47 05/06/01 Sun
        Re: You don't know?? Yes I do! -- Jim, 21:19:09 05/09/01 Wed
- Re: Ben, a question? -- Ben, 20:35:05 03/23/01 Fri
  - Re: Reality vs. Myth -- Chazman, 00:16:38 03/24/01 Sat
    - Re: Reality vs. Myth -- Ben, 13:55:42 03/24/01 Sat
      - Re: Can you read??? -- Chazman, 16:36:21 03/24/01 Sat
        Re: Can you read??? -- underpar, 18:55:44 03/24/01 Sat
      - Re: P.S. Ben -- Chazman, 16:46:50 03/24/01 Sat
        Re: P.S. Ben -- Ben, 18:44:41 03/24/01 Sat
        Re: P.S. Ben -- GeneO, 01:06:22 03/25/01 Sun
        Re: P.S. Ben -- Ben, 01:25:19 03/25/01 Sun
        Re: P.S. Ben -- Ben, 01:35:39 03/25/01 Sun
        Re: P.S. Ben -- GeneO, 02:36:56 03/25/01 Sun
        Patent was changed -- Dave Brown, 12:35:05 03/25/01 Sun
        Re: Patent was changed, Yeah, and the "Checks in the Mail" -- Chazman, 13:07:56 03/25/01 Sun
        Re: Patent was changed, Yeah, and the "Checks in the Mail" -- Michaell, 15:10:08 03/25/01 Sun
        You don't have to order a "freedom of information" request! -- Chazman, 13:23:17 03/27/01 Tue
        I am a doofus -- John F., 11:29:45 01/07/02 Mon
        That is obvious John -- Jon, 14:14:08 01/07/02 Mon
        I was told the opposite .... -- Bobman, 14:53:55 03/27/01 Tue
        Agreed -- Jim, 09:32:17 05/05/01 Sat
        Re: Thanks... -- GeneO, 14:55:36 03/25/01 Sun
        Re: Thanks... -- John, 14:12:33 05/06/01 Sun

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.