I don't know enough about the Bible to be able to talk intelligently about it for too long, but is there anything that Baby G said or thought or believed that was particularly *anti*sexual, or would lead us to believe that he would not utilize his sexual (whatever) towards the betterment of his agenda? -- Eddie Pedantic Gasbag Discussion Group

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:59:11 07/25/01 Wed
Author: Vex.,it's a weird conversation, but interesting nonetheless!
Subject: I don't know enough about the Bible to be able to talk intelligently about it for too long, but is there anything that Baby G said or thought or believed that was particularly *anti*sexual, or would lead us to believe that he would not utilize his sexual (whatever) towards the betterment of his agenda?
In reply to: Roxy 's message, "...and what I meant by *sexual being* is not only that he might have had sex, but that he would be viewed as a sexual (I'm not sure if *object* is the right word, but you know what I mean), by some of his followers." on 16:10:37 07/25/01 Wed

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Hmm, I can't say anything specific, I'd have to have memorized the Bible, which I haven't...but I don't think that he would have really *used* his sexuality - that would indicate a different intent - but I think he would have been attractive to some people in a sexual way, just like any other human being. The idea of being celibate comes from when he told the apostles to form the Church, and that they should not take wives, because the Church would be their "wife" - meaning that their lives would be dedicated exclusively to their beliefs, that having a wife would not allow them to be completely and fully dedicated. That's the gist of that part, that's why priests are supposed to remain celibate/unmarried/etc. (NT) -- Roxy, 17:22:18 07/25/01 Wed
- Yeah, you're right -- *used* isn't exactly the right words for what I was trying to say, but you got the gist of it. Interesting, that the logic behind celibacy is based on "best use of time", it sounds like, rather than being based on any sort of moral judgement. Who knows? Hell, we don't even know, really, what Baby G looked like. He could have been hideously unattractive for all we know. But I still think that a large part of creating a cult of personality is having that sexual shazam that just makes everyone weak in the knees... (NT) -- Vex., talking rubbish..., 09:24:45 07/26/01 Thu