VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:49:42 01/02/03 Thu
Author: Chatter
Subject: I agree completely. Bright is an early entry to the NBA, and Plummer is a blossoming star that would flourish at UC.
In reply to: bearcatattack 's message, "Plummer is better than Pilgrim" on 19:19:39 12/30/02 Mon

I'd sign Plummer right now. White may leave before his junior year and that leaves only Kirkland at SF with Hicks at PF. Pilgrim at PF. Plummer is homegrown, knows Pilgrim, and is very versatile.......I think the sky is the limit for this kid.

I'd recruit and sign him now before Loserville gets him. Comments he has made have made it clear he'd like to come home to UC.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.