VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456[7] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:53:23 09/27/02 Fri
Author: Chatter
Subject: I agree. L$U is a poor choice for Tack. I would have liked to have him because he's like a secret weapon (unguardable).....but with our load of guards and Butler coming in......really didn't need him. LSU gives too much freedom to players and they don't learn and improve. I can see him being the same selfish player when he's a senior. He needed some discipline.....and Huggs would have instilled that in him. Oh well. Let's move on.
In reply to: KB 's message, "UC pretty much stopped recruiting Tac a while ago." on 19:02:40 09/27/02 Fri


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.