VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2] ]
Subject: Diatribe


Author:
Steve Gagne
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 01:15:59 04/08/03 Tue
In reply to: help 's message, "Is the UCFM a denomination" on 00:51:26 04/04/03 Fri

I speak as one who has the "advantage" of usually being ignored. So no one attempts to enlist my support, and I get more opportunity to see things objectively.


(1) Just because the UCFM has a 'statement of faith' - is it in reality, a denomination, and if so, why?

Yes, the UCFM is a denomination. Not only does it have a statement of faith, there are a set of secondary or secular issues which are considered "litmus tests" for membership, and people are are either driven out or disavow their own membership based on questions of conscience. This appears to be because, as a faith community ("denomination"), each feels he is his brother's keeper, and feels responsible for the the points of faith, religious and secular, that his brother holds. Examples:

(a) the vilification I received when I first joined two years ago by a number of members on several occasions, because they couldn't stand either my sense of humor nor any message of prophecy I attempted to share;

(b) the choice by Randy to withdraw because he felt his catholicism to be "inconsistent" with the UCFM statement of faith (ratified by the rabid anti-catholic bigotry expressed by many members here);

(c) the choice and decision to drive out Dr. Walter Abington over a secular issue (and leave district #1 without a bishop at the time when Pastor Fred already has his hands full). This was STUPID. Not unforgiveable, but a definite mistake and a sin against the Body of Christ;

(d) the choice by Carla to withdraw due to the anger and hostility in the polemics of advocates of various doctrinal positions;

(e) the choice by Mark to withdraw due to perceived doctinal impurities on the part of the membership.

Okay so I take all this personally (not very surprising -- I am, after all, a person). Perhaps every denomination (cult) has a shaking-out period. But small-mindedness like that reported above gives rise to the observation:

"The Name of our God is blasphemed amongst the Gentiles because of you."



(2) Is denominationalism 'bad', or does it just provide a place for like minded believers to worship?

Denominationalism is condemned in Scripture:

10. I appeal to you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree and that there be no dissensions among you, but that you be united in the same mind and the same judgment.
11. For it has been reported to me by Chloe's people that there is quarreling among you, my brethren.
12. What I mean is that each one of you says, "I belong to Paul," or "I belong to Apollos," or "I belong to Cephas," or "I belong to Christ."
13. Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?
14. I am thankful that I baptized none of you except Crispus and Gaius;
15. lest any one should say that you were baptized in my name.
16. (I did baptize also the household of Stephanas. Beyond that, I do not know whether I baptized any one else.)
17. For Christ did not send me to baptize but to preach the gospel, and not with eloquent wisdom, lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power. (I Cor.1:10-17 RSV)


There are those who seek only to empty the Cross of its power.

And yet our God is the God of History, and makes His Will known in and through the history of man. The facts will always remain that the Church Visible, the Church Militant went astray at least 600 years ago, and the LORD God Almighty raised up denominationalism as a rebuke to the Church Visible, as he raised up the Chaldeans in rebuke to a stiff-necked Israel (Habakkuk 1:5-11). Each of the faithful have been held in Naziritic separation and consecration, no matter what denomination, in anticipation of the corporate repentance of the Church. It has taken this long for the Church to correct its errors. But now that the errors are being withdrawn, the reasons for our Naziritic separation from the Church Visible are passing away. WE ARE THE CHURCH. THE CATHOLIC CHURCHES ARE **OURS** NO LESS THAN OUR OWN LOCAL CONGREGATIONS. AND THE ESTABLISHED CURIA HAVE NEITHER RIGHT NOR POWER TO STAND IN OUR WAY. VICTORY IN THE GOSPEL!


(3) What, in your view, if the UCFM ISN'T a denomination, makes it different? (No 'webster's dictionary' terms - I have one too - I want your opinions).

I just checked the webpage with the statement of beliefs. The statement of beliefs make it clear that the first thing "WE" believe is important is "WE". Not God the Father. Not Jesus, the Son of the Living God. Not the Holy Ghost, Spirit of Truth and the Lord of Life. Not the Bible. Who and what "WE" are.

I guess that makes "WE" special.

Every other website I found, which spoke of believing the Bible, put the Bible first as an idol, like some holy object with a secret, magical, sacramental power to work wonders in peoples' lives, independent of the Holy Spirit's working's in one's soul and spirit. It's amazing how many so-called believers think God comes in second place after the Bible.

So I guess "WE" are not idol worshippers like everyone else. Just self-centered, selfish, stubborn, unforgiving, and lacking in Christian charity. And if you're inclined to say "speak for yourself, buddy" then you've already been convicted of every word I've written here:

10. As for a man who is factious, after admonishing him once or twice, have nothing more to do with him,
11. knowing that such a person is perverted and sinful; he is self-condemned. (Titus 3:10-11, RSV)



========================================================
So you can see why I didn't post this over at the new board -- I'd be getting an invite to join Walter. The thing is, Carla, Rod, and Mike prayed me out of a potential cult situation in my personal life just a few months ago. And now we see signs of it happening here. Hmmphhh.



stephen the 5/8 forgiven

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> Subject: Re: Diatribe


Author:
Rev Msgr Randy Kemp, Ph.D. - www.unlimitedgrace.net
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 03:52:23 04/08/03 Tue

Wonderful posts, Steve. Recently I find myself spending more time at First International Church of the Web (www.ficotw.org), because the members there are more focused upon getting together and sharing fellowship in the name of Christ, rather then critize folks for their Christian background (whether Catholic, penticostal, etc.) I still maintain a "loose" association with UCFM, in that I belong to the EA of UCFM. But I am not ordained by them or active in the UCFM church.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Hi Steve, you misunderstood my position...


Author:
MarkM
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 15:15:23 04/08/03 Tue

...or I did not state my self clearly.

First I agree with much of what you said. Its almost 3:00pm and I have little time to write this because I have to pick up the kids from school. Ill say more later.

RE:
(e) the choice by Mark to withdraw due to perceived doctrinal impurities on the part of the membership.

First I did NOT withdraw from UCFM, I’m just not going to post on the other “MESSAGE BOARD”. Because the other board is perceived more as a body of fellowship by many. Were contending in any way is looked down on.

Also on the other board, posts like yours are censored as with replies made to them.
As I am the Asst. ADMIN on this I will not do that. Unless the thread breaks down into rude name calling.

I know that you, Randy, and me differ on doctrinal issues but I do believe we can agree to disagree(sometimes strongly) and at the sametime not fall apart like a bunch a babies. We maybe even learn something from each other.

Yes UCFM is a denomination, but one that is struggling to find its self.

Got to go

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Welcome to the UCFM Mutual Admiration Society :)


Author:
Steve
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 04:04:00 04/09/03 Wed

"I know that you, Randy, and me differ on doctrinal issues but I do believe we can agree to disagree(sometimes strongly) and at the sametime not fall apart like a bunch a babies. We maybe even learn something from each other."

Thank you. (I gotta watch out before this becomes a mutual admiration society -- ;) .)

But why are we the only ones who can do this? Among us, the three of us that is, we don't take doctrinal disagreements as attacks on ours or each other's integrity. I mean, see how you & Rod get under each other's skin sometimes? Why? I know he gets touchy sometimes, but he does have a good heart; there just seems to be more to it than just doctrinal differences. For the same reason I don't answer [someone else]'s posts -- I would react the same way toward him. Not that he's a bad person, but his posts are just...i don't know, too "saccharine"?

[Note to Randy -- not neglecting you, RLK. Just can't remember anything you've said recently that would warrant my picking on you. LOL]

Btw didn't mean to misstate your position. But you are withdrawing from fellowship at the other board. And since the Community Center has been gone for, what, a YEAR now (?), and noone has time to issue a newsletter, the board is the only way any of us who do not have admin clearance get any idea about what the UCFM is doing. So if you're not there anymore, you're just not THERE anymore.

talk atcha l8r


yiC

stephen the 5/8 forgiven

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Welcome to the UCFM Mutual Admiration Society :)


Author:
Rev Msgr Randy Kemp, Ph.D. - www.unlimitedgrace.net
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 07:23:50 04/09/03 Wed

I am currently taking a history of Christianity class at the College of Dupage. The professor is a Baptist minister and got his Bachelor's and Master's in theology at a Baptist University, but went on for his Ph.D. in theology at a Roman Catholic University. When I sent him an email asking him how one can distinquish what is a correct historical perspective regarding protestant, orthodox or Catholic theology, he had a very good answer. He mentioned that the rational mind can only take us so far and we have to take a leap of faith. He also mentioned that in matters of theology, we get some things right and some things wrong, since we don't see the full picture as human beings. He also said we must humble outselves before the mystery of God. Considering he is a professional protestant theologian with a Ph.D., as well as a book author, I think this is an excellent response. And living the mystery is the essence of a recent response I got from an American priest conducting a Russian Orthodox service in English.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Welcome to the UCFM Mutual Admiration Society :)


Author:
Rev Msgr Randy Kemp, Ph.D. - www.unlimitedgrace.net
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:13:41 04/09/03 Wed

Another thing I have always found confusing is the mission of UCFM to be a "united Christian faith ministry", but going about defining the theological criteria by which someone belongs to the Christian faith. So you are playing with a two edged so. It's kind of like saying: I open this door for everyone to walk in and become a member, but you must dress the way I do to come inside.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: Diatribe


Author:
"help"
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 09:55:21 04/17/03 Thu

I just wanted to thank you all for the input. I don't agree with some of those here either - and like ficotw for the same reasons - although it has it's scary side at times too. I think the advantage of boards like this one and that are that the messages disappear eventually.

Stephen - 5/8 forgiven - I have seen you around, and appreciate your candor. I disagree with you too on a couple of points - but like your path of logic.

Randy - I have not said this to you personally, though I have seen you around for years too. I think you are weird - and Roman Catholicism is just plain scary to me a simple protestant. Note: Congratulations on "Monseignor" (sp?) - LOL.

Again, I agree to that we should be able to agree on all but the most obvious and blantant issues (Jesus as Son of God, His sacrifice for our sins, salvation by faith) - the rest tends to be 'extra' I think.

So, next question. If this is an example of 'non'-denominationalism, what would real non-denominationalism look like? I am to understand there is a difference between 'interfaith' and 'non-denominationalism', but it seems the best 'non-denom's' tend toward 'inter-faith' to me. If you have an example - please give it.

Thanks.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Points of correction


Author:
Rev Msgr Randy Kemp, Ph.D. - www.unlimitedgrace.net
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:52:13 04/17/03 Thu

---> Steve Talking <---
Randy - I have not said this to you personally, though I have seen you around for years too. I think you are weird - and Roman Catholicism is just plain scary to me a simple protestant. Note: Congratulations on "Monseignor" (sp?) - LOL.
--------------------------------------------------------
---> Randy's reply <----
If you think I am wierd, Steve, I wonder what you think about the holy fool tradition of the Eastern Orthodox Church? See http://www.incommunion.org/fools.htm
----------------------------------------------------------
And just a footnote here. Catholic really means "universal church" and is not limited to Roman Catholicism. You have to include the Eastern Orthodox churches (Greek, Russian, etc), all the churches in the Anglican communion (Church of England), and any church derived from any of the above churches (for example - the Old Roman Catholic Church, which succeeded from the RC over the issue of papal primacy). And now some of the Lutheran church are part of apostolic succession, like those in some countries in Europe or part of the Anglican communion (after all, wasn't Martin Luther a Catholic reformer in his original intention?) Personally, my theology is an Anglican/Eastern Orthodox hybrid and NOT Roman Catholic.
-----------------------------------------------------------
The title of monsignor in the Catholic tradition is no different or stranger then one being called Bishop or regional elder in UCFM.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Points of correction


Author:
Mr. "Help", or joefisher
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:46:45 04/17/03 Thu

Sorry Randy, I am not steve. I apologize for any confusion.

I am posting under a pseudonym for my own reasons - like, I was told to (go figure that one out, I can't - and it has nothing to do with MarkM either).

I mean you are weird in the nicest possible way, but I will explain it. As a simple John 3:16 is it - type protestant, a lot of your mysticism/ orthodox/ Catholic posts are generally quite confusing to me personally. This has nothing to do with you of course. It is my personally lack of understanding. But I will not deny, some of your posts I have often been left wondering - "am I supposed to understand"? I guess, and this isn't a shot, you are just to 'deep' for me sometimes.

As someone notice the free email addy, also under an assumed name I borrowed from a friend, I will use it here.

-joefisher

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Points of correction


Author:
steve
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 02:54:22 04/18/03 Fri

psst, Randy --

that wasn't me

steve

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Points of correction


Author:
Tom Donoho
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 08:13:00 09/03/03 Wed

Whoa!

I believe the title of "monsignor" (translated as "my lord", similar to the French use/translation in that language) is a totally honorific one bestowed by the Roman Cathoilc Church upon a priest who at one time or another was "attached" to the Vatican City or former papal estates. It is not the same as bishop or elder. That's my understanding. A good source of information for some Roman Catholic titles is "The A to Z of the Holy See" (the author escapes me at present).

Blessings...

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Points of correction


Author:
Tom Donoho
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 08:27:22 09/03/03 Wed

I tried to edit my response in the matter of "monsignor" but it wouldn't let me do it. Just wanted to change "estates" to "states" and mention that "monsignor" is also conferred on a priest of advanced age in lieu of an actual "promotion". It is an honorific and courtesy title.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Sorry Steve - my mistake


Author:
Rev Msgr Randy Kemp, Ph.D. - www.unlimitedgrace.net
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 11:00:33 04/17/03 Thu

Sorry Steve. I thought you were posting. I don't put much stock or faith in the words of someone replying who is too shy or frightened to identify themselves.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: IP address lookup


Author:
Rev Msgr Randy Kemp, Ph.D. - www.unlimitedgrace.net
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 11:09:46 04/17/03 Thu

If you go to IP monster at http://www.ipmonster.com/
you can gather a lot of information about our unknown poster.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: Diatribe


Author:
MarkM
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 11:26:19 04/17/03 Thu

Hi Diatribe, welcome!

I too appreciate peoples candor, and when people understand that message boards (as with this one) are FORUMS.

Forums:
© 2003 by Merriam-Webster:
"A public meeting place for open discussion c : a medium [as with a Internet message board] of open discussion or expression of ideas.... a public meeting or lecture involving audience discussion"

I hope this message board will serve as a good medium for discussion. My hopes are that it will be a place of intelligent discussion and not a place that breaks down into rude name calling during such discussion.

I understand full well that the topic of religion is one of deep personal experience, and when a doctrine one holds is challenged, often people take it as a personal attack. This can cause a break down in communication resulting in quick reactions and then rude name calling.

May we all be a little thick-skinned, be forgiving, and ask for forgiveness when our emotions get the best of us and they will sometimes.


Now about: "...what would real non-denominationalism look like.."

I understand a true nondenominational Church is one that stands alone, that it is not connected to a net-work of other local churches, who all agree on a set statement of faith or stated doctrines. Most often people think of it as being churches not affiliated with the major Christian denotations.


RE: "...difference between 'interfaith' and 'non-denominationalism.."

))snip((
Much of what is referred to as "nondenominational" is actually "interdenominational".
So what's the difference?
"Interdenominational" accepts all beliefs, "Nondenominational" rejects all man-made doctrines and strives to follow only what the Bible teaches.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: Hello Joe Fisher


Author:
Rev Msgr Randy Kemp, Ph.D. - www.unlimitedgrace.net
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12:24:20 04/17/03 Thu

If you click on help under the help message, the email identify says Joe Fisher. I didn't find you in the UCFM roaster, so I wonder what your association is with UCFM - if any. Care to share some background? (If that is your real name!)

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Hello Joe Fisher --- NOT ME !!


Author:
MarkM
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 17:17:34 04/17/03 Thu

I don't know what you did but when I clicked on properties I got this:

"mailto:markm@minister.com"

The above is my E-mail address, I am a member of UCFM, Ordained by UCFM, and Pastor Fred has aloud me to be an Asst. ADMIN. of this board. I know the Message Board password, and its be me who has been changing backgrounds, lines, and editing the board. I also wrote the terms of service for this board.

Randy we have been posting for sometime, you know me, what’s up, why the questions?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Randy I hope .....


Author:
MarkM
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 17:40:02 04/17/03 Thu

...."HELP's" use of the word -weird- did not upset you to much. I debated deleting, but that would have deleted your reply’s also and I did not want to do that.
Therefore, I made my little speech about Forums and us not breaking down into name calling and that we need to be a little thick-skinned when posting in forums.

You OK?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Hello Mark!


Author:
Rev Msgr Randy Kemp, Ph.D. - www.unlimitedgrace.net
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:44:00 04/17/03 Thu

Hello Mark. No. It is hard to get me upset! But if someone does mention people by name - with commentary - then I feel they should public identify themselves. Right? I tried clicking on where it says "author help", both at my home and work computers, and it says Joe Fisher. And I know I'm not crazy or taking anything not prescibed by a physician.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: I'm Sorry Already


Author:
JoeFisher
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 20:10:39 04/17/03 Thu

OK, just for clarification. ON THIS BOARD I have been ASKED to use a psydonym if I am going to be 'open and honest' and speak my own mind. So I am doing that.

Since I am sure some of you hackers out there enjoy the challenge, yes, you could probably figure it out easily enough. Just keep me out of trouble, please, by keeping it to yourself when you do.

Randy, I apologize again for the use of the term 'weird' - I think if I had posted as the name you might recognize, it would never have been taken wrong. Yes, I was trying to poke a little fun at you, but more due to my lack of ability to keep up with you - which is something I know many people can't do. Let me say I have defended you before - and talked to you before. Please respect my anonymity on this issue. At some time, in another forum perhaps - I would like more information from you on the mysticisms and rituals you often speak of, for my own educations sake.

NOW - to the point of the questioning:
IF I understand MarkM's post correctly, there is no such thing as an 'organization' of non-denom. church's. He indicates that they would stand alone. I would like this expanded on - I don't believe it to be wholy true.

I also noticed MarkM's post on doctrine, which I loved. Given this, I ask, a lot of the 'man made doctrine's' come from us trying to interpret the Bible in areas it is less than clear - to our insect-like understanding. Is it wrong to attempt the understanding? Is it correct to 'play down' some of these issues - with the knowledge that if it was supposed to be clear, it would be (this is my view, btw).

For background purposes, I am a member on one hand of a denomination that is about as non-denominational as you can get, and a non-denomination that is about as denominational as you can get - and am looking for others experiences.

Bro. Randy, specfically, where does non-denominationalism and it's stance on "Bible Only" fit it with Tradition for you? This is an honest question - not intended to poke fun at you. I do respect you opinions and knowledge, even where we differ (greatly at times).

Thank you all for your understanding.

-joefisher

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: Apology accepted


Author:
Rev Msgr Randy Kemp, Ph.D. - www.unlimitedgrace.net
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 04:13:14 04/18/03 Fri

Joe:
The bible only is called "Sola Scriptura". While I respect my protestant brothers and sisters, I have to disagree that only a written tradition was given, and we also have an oral tradition handled down by the apostles. And I closely side with the Eastern Orthodox theologians on this issue. Considering that protestant apologists are still debating with Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox apologists on this topic, let's both adknowledge that this would be a big division between a Catholic and Orthodox outlook, and a protestant one. But I would add this. Protestants are NOT in agreement over what holy scripture means or who correctly hears the voice of the Holy Spirit. If they did, then you wouldn't have thousands of different protestant denominations, each with their own spin on things.
Randy

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.