No, the document did NOT say anything about slaves. -- WASHINGTON BOARD

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:08:27 10/11/02 Fri
Author: Wilbs
Author Host/IP: 208-58-250-196.s450.tnt1.nwhv.ct.dialup.rcn.com / 208.58.250.196
Subject: No, the document did NOT say anything about slaves.
In reply to: Grumpy� 's message, "Re: Hmmmmmm is right" on 22:21:20 09/22/02 Sun

And I have read it.

It does not allow for, or even mention the practice of keeping slaves. Perhaps you could find a paragraph and quote it for me, since you are SOOOOO FAMILIAR with it.

Please, be my guest.

And, tell me the paragraph that allows the federal government to tax us for education, welfare, federal parks, some stupid building in Tenessee that the representative has some ability to grab those tax dollars???

Tell me Grumpy, do you read it with the liberal slant given to you by FDR, who by the way did NOT WRITE the Constitution?

You, are an insulting individual, who sees the world through his own little glass. And when someone doesn't agree with you, or who doesn't read the Constitution through some all encompassing liberal glass, giving it all kinds of meanings it never had, you're extremely obnoxious.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Article I, Section 2, Paragraph 3 of the original wording is; -- Grumpy�, 21:24:13 10/11/02 Fri
- And another thing; -- Grumpy�, 21:26:53 10/11/02 Fri
  - Ok. There is reference to slavery -- Wilbs, 20:53:31 10/14/02 Mon
    - Re: Ok. There is reference to slavery -- Grumpy�, 22:59:18 10/14/02 Mon
      - And Catholics were not treated very well -- Wilbs, 19:36:01 10/16/02 Wed
        Re: And Catholics were not treated very well -- Grumpy�, 21:15:07 10/18/02 Fri
        You are right. -- wILBS, 18:52:24 10/29/02 Tue
        Re: You are right. -- Grumpy�, 00:27:09 10/30/02 Wed
        It's all about Cat tracks -- Wilbs, 21:01:28 11/01/02 Fri
        Re: It's all about Cat tracks -- Grumpy�, 01:14:24 11/02/02 Sat
        Re: It's all about Cat tracks -- Wilbs, 19:54:11 11/08/02 Fri