VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]3 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:38:13 08/07/05 Sun
Author: Lord Veritas
Subject: Rants about the "lost gospels" (another exploration of one of Sheepdog's tangents)

Hello again, Sheepdog,
You mentioned that there were other texts that did not make it into the Bible. Please put all info about those here. To help you get started, I suggest you tell us how the Gospel of Thomas could have been written by Thomas when he was killed more than five decades before it was written. Write as much as you need to write about the subject here, so that you will no longer have to use this as a distraction from the salvation doctrine argument, either.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> Re: Rants about the "lost gospels" (another exploration of one of Sheepdog's tangents) -- Sheepdog, 17:22:26 08/27/05 Sat

Hello Lo Ve
You wrote this:
You mentioned that there were other texts that did not make it into the Bible. Please put all info about those here.
SD: You say that because they are gone and burned and you know I can’t produce an actual text, other than the ones recently found that I HAVE mentioned.
How about you produce the original texts of the NT so that we can carbon date them??????

This is a quote from an Orthodox Christian Church web site:
   ” In the early years of the Christian Church, those most important books of Holy Scripture that we call the Gospels did not exist.  Several decades passed after Pentecost before the first Gospel was written.  It was the end of the first century by the time all four Gospels were written.  Three hundred more years passed before a decision was made in the Church that there would be only four Gospels.

The books that are in the Holy Scriptures, both Old and New Testaments, are there because God's people, through those who were set aside as having the authority to make the decision, decided that these books would be part of the Bible, and other books would not.  The Church, as God's people inspired by God, wrote the Bible.  The Church produced the Bible, The Bible did not produce the Church. “ End quote.
So, LoVe, the apostles didn’t produce the book, nor did they build their church around any script. The true Christian church back then was NOT a Bible church. They had no Bible. Who said it should be any different now?
The OCC and the Catholic Church claim full authority to choose which books are contained in what you now call the Bible. They did not include all the scripts that they had.
Why not include all of them and let us decide for ourselves which ones are worthy to be taken seriously?

LoVe: To help you get started, I suggest you tell us how the Gospel of Thomas could have been written by Thomas when he was killed more than five decades before it was written.
SD: If the above quote by OCC is true, then I’d say that NONE of the gospels existed until SEVERAL decades after the Pentecost. So why exclude the one of Thomas? Prove to me that ANY of the Gospels were written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, or John. Show me proof of any original script which carbon dates to Jesus' time.The church admits that it chose the books that would be included and others that would not.

LoVe: Write as much as you need to write about the subject here, so that you will no longer have to use this as a distraction from the salvation doctrine argument, either.

SD:
Was I wrong about the combining of Christianity & Paganism?
Was I wrong about Sunday and the Christian sabbath?
Was I wrong about Christmas being the Sun God’s birthday?
Was I wrong about Easter?
I was NOT wrong.
Considering these facts, would it be a stretch of anyone's imagination to assume that there were plenty of true Christian beliefs, including doctrines of salvation, and rituals that were extinguished because they didn’t fit into the blending of Christianity and Paganism?
As far as Salvation goes, if you base your salvation on an incomplete book, given to you by a corrupted church, I don’t think you’ve sought for full truth as much as you could have.
The true church and saints didn’t have the Book, are you better off than they when you base your whole salvation in a book that they didn’t even have? The Bible is a wonderful tool with much truth in it, but it is not the only tool in the shed.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]


[> [> Canon of NT Scripture? -- Capital Rendition, 11:56:04 03/20/09 Fri

(1) Gospel of Thomas.
Source: Judas Thomas the Twin (St.Thomas)
Year c.37 a.d.
Notations: Possible the elusive "Q" text. Recorded before Christians understood the need for own Scriptures; irremediably damaged in transmission; rejected for changes wrought by Gnostics.

(2) Gospel of John Mark
Sources: Shimon/Kepha (St. Peter), possibly "Q" additions
Year c.42-45 a.d.
Notations: first authoritative NT writing

(3) Gospel of Levi/Matthew (Gospel to the Hebrews)
Sources: Levi/Matthew, possibly "Q" additions
Year c.50-52 a.d.
Notations: oldest known manuscripts, radiocarbon dated to c.75-80 a.d. with obvious copyist corrections (original has to be older)

(4) Gospel of Luke & Book of Acts of the Apostles
Sources: Luke, Miryam/Virgin Mary, Shaul/Paul, Bar-Navi/Barnabas, possibly "Q" additions
Year c.58-60 a.d.
Notations: Two-volume work. No mention in "Acts" of the martyrdoms of Shimon/Kepha (St.Peter in 61-62 a.d.) or Shaul (St.Paul in 64-65 a.d.)

(5) Gospel of Yohannan/John
Sources: Yohannan/John, Miryam/Virgin Mary, Miryam of Magdala/Mary Magdalene.
Year c.65-75 a.d. (unclear)
Notations: Non-synoptic gospel comprising basic Church theodicy.

(6) Epistles
Years c.45-65 a.d. (most referenced in Acts)

(7) Apocalypse of Yohannan/John
Source: Yohannan/John
Year c.95 a.d.
Notation: last book accepted as scripture by Christian community.



During this time, there was a growing recognition that these works were inspired in the same sense that the OT books were. Until this recognition was made explicit, what had been regarded as scripture were:

(1) The Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Jewish scriptures, including the deuterocanonical books known as the Apocrypha.

(2) The Three Books of Enoch.

(3) Some of the Essene writings (The Teacher of Righteousness, for one).

(4) To a lesser extent, the Book of Formation, the Book of Brilliance, the Talmud, the Midrash, & targums.



Due to the resources involved, few people had "the Scriptures" available in their entirety, leaving those preaching the Gospel for the next century to rely on other tools. The most popular of these were the "Didache (Teachings) of the Apostles", and the "Diatessaron of Tatian" (a harmony of the four Gospels). For teaching purposes, these stood in the stead of any "approved" Scripture.


This approval, rule, or "canon" of Scripture was finalized by about 150-160 a.d., and, except for some debate about substituting the "Second Epistle of Clement" for the "Apocalypse", is the same canon we use today. It was documented in c.177-180 a.d. by Irenaeus of Lyons, in his work "Against the Heresies." This standardization was ostensibly to eliminate the Gnostic claptrap that had grown up around Christianity in the previous hundred years, but more importantly, it was necessary because of a heretic named Marcion (& his followers), who tried to hijack the Scriptures (and Christianity along with them), claiming that anything "Jewish" about them was totally invalid and needed to be burned. They thus rejected the OT & the Gospels, accepting only the Epistles of Paul. (No problem with consistency THERE, mind you.)



Please note that all the NT apocrypha/pseudepigrapha were thus ALREADY excluded by the Church more than 150 years before Constantine was even born. These include but are not limited to:

The Secret Gospel of Mark
The Gospel of the Aeons
The Apocalypse of Peter
The Apocalypse of Mary
The Gospel of Barnabas
The Shepherd of Hermas
etc.
etc.
etc.

But do note that "The Gospel of Philip" is specifically excluded from this list, as it is not a 1st- or 2nd-century piece of NT apocrypha, but rather a 15th-century anti-Christian Muslim forgery (like the 10th-century anti-Jewish Muslim forgery "Alphabet of Ben-Sira" or the 19th-century anti-Jewish Muslim forgery "Protocols of the Elders of Zion").



(BTW, there's a chance I inadvertently included some facts above. There are no guarantees that I just made this all up off the top of my head.)

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: Canon of NT Scripture? -- CR (oops), 14:13:24 03/20/09 Fri

I think I got the Gospel of Barnabas & the Gospel of Philip backwards.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]


[> MORONS AND OTHER HEATHENS, HAVE YOU FORGOTTEN SOMETHING? -- Brother D. Thomas, 03:11:10 09/17/05 Sat

A SUCKER BORN EVERY MINUTE

Joseph Smith, got his new religion going by writing a book known as The Book of Mormon. The book was much too dull to make it as a novel. Mark Twain called the book "chloroform in print" so it was marketed as a new bible! H-E-L-L-O? Having quite a flair for publicity, Smith pretended to have translated The Book of Mormon from a pile of gold plates dug out of a glacial hill in upstate New York with the help of a resurrected man no less!

The BOM purports to tell of lost tribes of Israelites and others floating to South America, some in giant barrels, others in a boat. Arriving in America, they all turned into Indians, (now we know why the indians had big noses) built cities, fought wars, received a visit from Jesus Christ after he couldn't make a go of it in Palestine, and finally killed each other off in A.D. 421. Shortly before the fatal fight a colossal battle allegedly waged at Hill Cumorah, near Palmyra, New York, a person (angel) appropriately name Moroni buried some "golden plates" for Josepth Smith, its founder, to find with his magic "seer stone!"

Now the comedy begins. Joseph Smith claimed he had a magic "seer stone," a stone with which he could see inside hills and beneath the surface of the ground to inspect for buried treasurers and enchantments! The seer stone became transformed into the biblical "urim and thummin" with which he later claimed he could "translate" any language, including "reformed Egyptian," the imaginary language in which his Jewish Indians supposedly had written their history. A locked box held what Smith claimed to be the gold plates bearing this reformed Egyptian Chaldee Jewish American Indian history. Are you believing this thus far? If so, the Golden Gate Bridge is still for sale!

Sitting in one-half of a room divided into two sections by means of a blanket hung from a rope, Smith would pretend to be translating aloud from the golden plates and would dictate The Book of Mormon to his secretary Martin Harris. Harris sat on the other side of the blanket, afraid to peek at the plates for fear he would be stricken with the plague, or the scab, or hemorrhoids, and the botch of Egypt. LOL After many days of such inventive labor, 116 pages of manuscript had been written. All of it supposedly translated by divine guidance by means of the magical seer stone!

This is the foundation of the BOM (Book of Morons) and if you take any further time reading it in its entirety, then you are more lonely than we thought. Who in the hell in their right mind would believe this story? LOL!! You've got to be pretty gullible to swallow such a history! Our history of Mount Sinai and Moses, Noahan deluge, parting of the Red Sea, the celestial impregnation of Mary, et al, is certainly more plausable than the Book of Mormon. What a joke. There's a sucker born every minute!

Brother D. Thomas
Always enlightening a cultural Christian!
http://p203.ezboard.com/ftruechristiansunitefrm7

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]


[> [> Re: MORONS AND JOANN ELLIS AND MATTHEW VANDERPOOL -- BRO.DAVE THOMAS?, 01:17:23 09/23/05 Fri

>A SUCKER BORN EVERY MINUTE
>
>Joseph Smith, got his new religion going by writing a
>book known as The Book of Mormon. The book was much
>too dull to make it as a novel. Mark Twain called the
>book "chloroform in print" so it was marketed as a new
>bible! H-E-L-L-O? Having quite a flair for publicity,
>Smith pretended to have translated The Book of Mormon
>from a pile of gold plates dug out of a glacial hill
>in upstate New York with the help of a resurrected man
>no less!
>
>The BOM purports to tell of lost tribes of Israelites
>and others floating to South America, some in giant
>barrels, others in a boat. Arriving in America, they
>all turned into Indians, (now we know why the indians
>had big noses) built cities, fought wars, received a
>visit from Jesus Christ after he couldn't make a go of
>it in Palestine, and finally killed each other off in
>A.D. 421. Shortly before the fatal fight a colossal
>battle allegedly waged at Hill Cumorah, near Palmyra,
>New York, a person (angel) appropriately name Moroni
>buried some "golden plates" for Josepth Smith, its
>founder, to find with his magic "seer stone!"
>
>Now the comedy begins. Joseph Smith claimed he had a
>magic "seer stone," a stone with which he could see
>inside hills and beneath the surface of the ground to
>inspect for buried treasurers and enchantments! The
>seer stone became transformed into the biblical "urim
>and thummin" with which he later claimed he could
>"translate" any language, including "reformed
>Egyptian," the imaginary language in which his Jewish
>Indians supposedly had written their history. A locked
>box held what Smith claimed to be the gold plates
>bearing this reformed Egyptian Chaldee Jewish American
>Indian history. Are you believing this thus far? If
>so, the Golden Gate Bridge is still for sale!
>
>Sitting in one-half of a room divided into two
>sections by means of a blanket hung from a rope, Smith
>would pretend to be translating aloud from the golden
>plates and would dictate The Book of Mormon to his
>secretary Martin Harris. Harris sat on the other side
>of the blanket, afraid to peek at the plates for fear
>he would be stricken with the plague, or the scab, or
>hemorrhoids, and the botch of Egypt. LOL After many
>days of such inventive labor, 116 pages of manuscript
>had been written. All of it supposedly translated by
>divine guidance by means of the magical seer stone!
>
>This is the foundation of the BOM (Book of Morons) and
>if you take any further time reading it in its
>entirety, then you are more lonely than we thought.
>Who in the hell in their right mind would believe this
>story? LOL!! You've got to be pretty gullible to
>swallow such a history! Our history of Mount Sinai and
>Moses, Noahan deluge, parting of the Red Sea, the
>celestial impregnation of Mary, et al, is certainly
>more plausable than the Book of Mormon. What a joke.
>There's a sucker born every minute!look at joann ellis
>as well as matthew vanderpool. drugs for sex
>Brother D. Thomas
>Always enlightening a cultural Christian!
>http://p203.ezboard.com/ftruechristiansunitefrm7

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: MORONS AND JOANN ELLIS AND MATTHEW VANDERPOOL -- BRO._DAVE, 00:06:40 12/21/06 Thu

>>A SUCKER BORN EVERY MINUTE
>>
>>Joseph Smith, got his new religion going by writing a
>>book known as The Book of Mormon. The book was much
>>too dull to make it as a novel. Mark Twain called the
>>book "chloroform in print" so it was marketed as a new
>>bible! H-E-L-L-O? Having quite a flair for publicity,
>>Smith pretended to have translated The Book of Mormon
>>from a pile of gold plates dug out of a glacial hill
>>in upstate New York with the help of a resurrected man
>>no less!
>>
>>The BOM purports to tell of lost tribes of Israelites
>>and others floating to South America, some in giant
>>barrels, others in a boat. Arriving in America, they
>>all turned into Indians, (now we know why the indians
>>had big noses) built cities, fought wars, received a
>>visit from Jesus Christ after he couldn't make a go of
>>it in Palestine, and finally killed each other off in
>>A.D. 421. Shortly before the fatal fight a colossal
>>battle allegedly waged at Hill Cumorah, near Palmyra,
>>New York, a person (angel) appropriately name Moroni
>>buried some "golden plates" for Josepth Smith, its
>>founder, to find with his magic "seer stone!"
>>
>>Now the comedy begins. Joseph Smith claimed he had a
>>magic "seer stone," a stone with which he could see
>>inside hills and beneath the surface of the ground to
>>inspect for buried treasurers and enchantments! The
>>seer stone became transformed into the biblical "urim
>>and thummin" with which he later claimed he could
>>"translate" any language, including "reformed
>>Egyptian," the imaginary language in which his Jewish
>>Indians supposedly had written their history. A locked
>>box held what Smith claimed to be the gold plates
>>bearing this reformed Egyptian Chaldee Jewish American
>>Indian history. Are you believing this thus far? If
>>so, the Golden Gate Bridge is still for sale!
>>
>>Sitting in one-half of a room divided into two
>>sections by means of a blanket hung from a rope, Smith
>>would pretend to be translating aloud from the golden
>>plates and would dictate The Book of Mormon to his
>>secretary Martin Harris. Harris sat on the other side
>>of the blanket, afraid to peek at the plates for fear
>>he would be stricken with the plague, or the scab, or
>>hemorrhoids, and the botch of Egypt. LOL After many
>>days of such inventive labor, 116 pages of manuscript
>>had been written. All of it supposedly translated by
>>divine guidance by means of the magical seer stone!
>>
>>This is the foundation of the BOM (Book of Morons) and
>>if you take any further time reading it in its
>>entirety, then you are more lonely than we thought.
>>Who in the hell in their right mind would believe this
>>story? LOL!! You've got to be pretty gullible to
>>swallow such a history! Our history of Mount Sinai and
>>Moses, Noahan deluge, parting of the Red Sea, the
>>celestial impregnation of Mary, et al, is certainly
>>more plausable than the Book of Mormon. What a joke.
>>There's a sucker born every minute!look at joann
>ellis
>>as well as matthew vanderpool. drugs for sex
>>Brother D. Thomas. aint tht like a whore?
>>Always enlightening a cultural Christian!
>>http://p203.ezboard.com/ftruechristiansunitefrm7

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: JOANN ELLIS AND MATTHEW VANDERPOOL -- matthew_vanderpool, 06:05:24 06/28/08 Sat

>>>A SUCKER BORN EVERY MINUTE
>>>
>>>Joseph Smith, got his new religion going by writing a
>>>book known as The Book of Mormon. The book was much
>>>too dull to make it as a novel. Mark Twain called the
>>>book "chloroform in print" so it was marketed as a
>new
>>>bible! H-E-L-L-O? Having quite a flair for publicity,
>>>Smith pretended to have translated The Book of Mormon
>>>from a pile of gold plates dug out of a glacial hill
>>>in upstate New York with the help of a resurrected
>man
>>>no less!
>>>
>>>The BOM purports to tell of lost tribes of Israelites
>>>and others floating to South America, some in giant
>>>barrels, others in a boat. Arriving in America, they
>>>all turned into Indians, (now we know why the indians
>>>had big noses) built cities, fought wars, received a
>>>visit from Jesus Christ after he couldn't make a go
>of
>>>it in Palestine, and finally killed each other off in
>>>A.D. 421. Shortly before the fatal fight a colossal
>>>battle allegedly waged at Hill Cumorah, near Palmyra,
>>>New York, a person (angel) appropriately name Moroni
>>>buried some "golden plates" for Josepth Smith, its
>>>founder, to find with his magic "seer stone!"
>>>
>>>Now the comedy begins. Joseph Smith claimed he had a
>>>magic "seer stone," a stone with which he could see
>>>inside hills and beneath the surface of the ground to
>>>inspect for buried treasurers and enchantments! The
>>>seer stone became transformed into the biblical "urim
>>>and thummin" with which he later claimed he could
>>>"translate" any language, including "reformed
>>>Egyptian," the imaginary language in which his Jewish
>>>Indians supposedly had written their history. A
>locked
>>>box held what Smith claimed to be the gold plates
>>>bearing this reformed Egyptian Chaldee Jewish
>American
>>>Indian history. Are you believing this thus far? If
>>>so, the Golden Gate Bridge is still for sale!
>>>
>>>Sitting in one-half of a room divided into two
>>>sections by means of a blanket hung from a rope,
>Smith
>>>would pretend to be translating aloud from the golden
>>>plates and would dictate The Book of Mormon to his
>>>secretary Martin Harris. Harris sat on the other side
>>>of the blanket, afraid to peek at the plates for fear
>>>he would be stricken with the plague, or the scab, or
>>>hemorrhoids, and the botch of Egypt. LOL After many
>>>days of such inventive labor, 116 pages of manuscript
>>>had been written. All of it supposedly translated by
>>>divine guidance by means of the magical seer stone!
>>>
>>>This is the foundation of the BOM (Book of Morons)
>and
>>>if you take any further time reading it in its
>>>entirety, then you are more lonely than we thought.
>>>Who in the hell in their right mind would believe
>this
>>>story? LOL!! You've got to be pretty gullible to
>>>swallow such a history! Our history of Mount Sinai
>and
>>>Moses, Noahan deluge, parting of the Red Sea, the
>>>celestial impregnation of Mary, et al, is certainly
>>>more plausable than the Book of Mormon. What a joke.
>>>There's a sucker born every minute!look at joann
>>ellis
>>>as well as matthew vanderpool. drugs for sex
>>>Brother D. Thomas, aint joann ellis a sorry excuse
>>> for a woman giving a missionary drugs for sex
>>> >href="http://p203.ezboard.com/ftruechristiansunitefrm7"
>>http://p203.ezboard.com/ftruechristiansunitefrm7

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Re: JOANN ELLIS AND MATTHEW VANDERPOOL -- dan (sad), 05:45:22 08/20/11 Sat

>>>>A SUCKER BORN EVERY MINUTE
>>>>
>>>>Joseph Smith, got his new religion going by writing
>a
>>>>book known as The Book of Mormon. The book was much
>>>>too dull to make it as a novel. Mark Twain called
>the
>>>>book "chloroform in print" so it was marketed as a
>>new
>>>>bible! H-E-L-L-O? Having quite a flair for
>publicity,
>>>>Smith pretended to have translated The Book of
>Mormon
>>>>from a pile of gold plates dug out of a glacial hill
>>>>in upstate New York with the help of a resurrected
>>man
>>>>no less!
>>>>
>>>>The BOM purports to tell of lost tribes of
>Israelites
>>>>and others floating to South America, some in giant
>>>>barrels, others in a boat. Arriving in America, they
>>>>all turned into Indians, (now we know why the
>indians
>>>>had big noses) built cities, fought wars, received a
>>>>visit from Jesus Christ after he couldn't make a go
>>of
>>>>it in Palestine, and finally killed each other off
>in
>>>>A.D. 421. Shortly before the fatal fight a colossal
>>>>battle allegedly waged at Hill Cumorah, near
>Palmyra,
>>>>New York, a person (angel) appropriately name Moroni
>>>>buried some "golden plates" for Josepth Smith, its
>>>>founder, to find with his magic "seer stone!"
>>>>
>>>>Now the comedy begins. Joseph Smith claimed he had a
>>>>magic "seer stone," a stone with which he could see
>>>>inside hills and beneath the surface of the ground
>to
>>>>inspect for buried treasurers and enchantments! The
>>>>seer stone became transformed into the biblical
>"urim
>>>>and thummin" with which he later claimed he could
>>>>"translate" any language, including "reformed
>>>>Egyptian," the imaginary language in which his
>Jewish
>>>>Indians supposedly had written their history. A
>>locked
>>>>box held what Smith claimed to be the gold plates
>>>>bearing this reformed Egyptian Chaldee Jewish
>>American
>>>>Indian history. Are you believing this thus far? If
>>>>so, the Golden Gate Bridge is still for sale!
>>>>
>>>>Sitting in one-half of a room divided into two
>>>>sections by means of a blanket hung from a rope,
>>Smith
>>>>would pretend to be translating aloud from the
>golden
>>>>plates and would dictate The Book of Mormon to his
>>>>secretary Martin Harris. Harris sat on the other
>side
>>>>of the blanket, afraid to peek at the plates for
>fear
>>>>he would be stricken with the plague, or the scab,
>or
>>>>hemorrhoids, and the botch of Egypt. LOL After many
>>>>days of such inventive labor, 116 pages of
>manuscript
>>>>had been written. All of it supposedly translated by
>>>>divine guidance by means of the magical seer stone!
>>>>
>>>>This is the foundation of the BOM (Book of Morons)
>>and
>>>>if you take any further time reading it in its
>>>>entirety, then you are more lonely than we thought.
>>>>Who in the hell in their right mind would believe
>>this
>>>>story? LOL!! You've got to be pretty gullible to
>>>>swallow such a history! Our history of Mount Sinai
>>and
>>>>Moses, Noahan deluge, parting of the Red Sea, the
>>>>celestial impregnation of Mary, et al, is certainly
>>>>more plausable than the Book of Mormon. What a joke.
>>>>There's a sucker born every minute!look at joann
>>>ellis
>>>>as well as matthew vanderpool. drugs for sex
>>>>Brother D. Thomas, aint joann ellis a sorry excuse
>>>> for a woman giving a missionary drugs for sex
>>>> joann is is sad

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: MORONS AND JOANN ELLIS AND MATTHEW VANDERPOOL -- matthew vanderpool (sad), 18:21:26 03/18/11 Fri

>>>A SUCKER BORN EVERY MINUTE
>>>
>>>Joseph Smith, got his new religion going by writing a
>>>book known as The Book of Mormon. The book was much
>>>too dull to make it as a novel. Mark Twain called the
>>>book "chloroform in print" so it was marketed as a
>new
>>>bible! H-E-L-L-O? Having quite a flair for publicity,
>>>Smith pretended to have translated The Book of Mormon
>>>from a pile of gold plates dug out of a glacial hill
>>>in upstate New York with the help of a resurrected
>man
>>>no less!
>>>
>>>The BOM purports to tell of lost tribes of Israelites
>>>and others floating to South America, some in giant
>>>barrels, others in a boat. Arriving in America, they
>>>all turned into Indians, (now we know why the indians
>>>had big noses) built cities, fought wars, received a
>>>visit from Jesus Christ after he couldn't make a go
>of
>>>it in Palestine, and finally killed each other off in
>>>A.D. 421. Shortly before the fatal fight a colossal
>>>battle allegedly waged at Hill Cumorah, near Palmyra,
>>>New York, a person (angel) appropriately name Moroni
>>>buried some "golden plates" for Josepth Smith, its
>>>founder, to find with his magic "seer stone!"
>>>
>>>Now the comedy begins. Joseph Smith claimed he had a
>>>magic "seer stone," a stone with which he could see
>>>inside hills and beneath the surface of the ground to
>>>inspect for buried treasurers and enchantments! The
>>>seer stone became transformed into the biblical "urim
>>>and thummin" with which he later claimed he could
>>>"translate" any language, including "reformed
>>>Egyptian," the imaginary language in which his Jewish
>>>Indians supposedly had written their history. A
>locked
>>>box held what Smith claimed to be the gold plates
>>>bearing this reformed Egyptian Chaldee Jewish
>American
>>>Indian history. Are you believing this thus far? If
>>>so, the Golden Gate Bridge is still for sale!
>>>
>>>Sitting in one-half of a room divided into two
>>>sections by means of a blanket hung from a rope,
>Smith
>>>would pretend to be translating aloud from the golden
>>>plates and would dictate The Book of Mormon to his
>>>secretary Martin Harris. Harris sat on the other side
>>>of the blanket, afraid to peek at the plates for fear
>>>he would be stricken with the plague, or the scab, or
>>>hemorrhoids, and the botch of Egypt. LOL After many
>>>days of such inventive labor, 116 pages of manuscript
>>>had been written. All of it supposedly translated by
>>>divine guidance by means of the magical seer stone!
>>>
>>>This is the foundation of the BOM (Book of Morons)
>and
>>>if you take any further time reading it in its
>>>entirety, then you are more lonely than we thought.
>>>Who in the hell in their right mind would believe
>this
>>>story? LOL!! You've got to be pretty gullible to
>>>swallow such a history! Our history of Mount Sinai
>and
>>>Moses, Noahan deluge, parting of the Red Sea, the
>>>celestial impregnation of Mary, et al, is certainly
>>>more plausable than the Book of Mormon. What a joke.
>>>There's a sucker born every minute!look at joann
>>ellis
>>>as well as matthew vanderpool. drugs for sex
>>>Brother D. Thomas. aint tht like a whore? well i was fucking her so she is a cheap whore

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Re: MORONS AND JOANN ELLIS AND MATTHEW VANDERPOOL -- joann (sad), 10:15:55 08/25/12 Sat

>>>>A SUCKER BORN EVERY MINUTE
>>>>
>>>>Joseph Smith, got his new religion going by writing
>a
>>>>book known as The Book of Mormon. The book was much
>>>>too dull to make it as a novel. Mark Twain called
>the
>>>>book "chloroform in print" so it was marketed as a
>>new
>>>>bible! H-E-L-L-O? Having quite a flair for
>publicity,
>>>>Smith pretended to have translated The Book of
>Mormon
>>>>from a pile of gold plates dug out of a glacial hill
>>>>in upstate New York with the help of a resurrected
>>man
>>>>no less!
>>>>
>>>>The BOM purports to tell of lost tribes of
>Israelites
>>>>and others floating to South America, some in giant
>>>>barrels, others in a boat. Arriving in America, they
>>>>all turned into Indians, (now we know why the
>indians
>>>>had big noses) built cities, fought wars, received a
>>>>visit from Jesus Christ after he couldn't make a go
>>of
>>>>it in Palestine, and finally killed each other off
>in
>>>>A.D. 421. Shortly before the fatal fight a colossal
>>>>battle allegedly waged at Hill Cumorah, near
>Palmyra,
>>>>New York, a person (angel) appropriately name Moroni
>>>>buried some "golden plates" for Josepth Smith, its
>>>>founder, to find with his magic "seer stone!"
>>>>
>>>>Now the comedy begins. Joseph Smith claimed he had a
>>>>magic "seer stone," a stone with which he could see
>>>>inside hills and beneath the surface of the ground
>to
>>>>inspect for buried treasurers and enchantments! The
>>>>seer stone became transformed into the biblical
>"urim
>>>>and thummin" with which he later claimed he could
>>>>"translate" any language, including "reformed
>>>>Egyptian," the imaginary language in which his
>Jewish
>>>>Indians supposedly had written their history. A
>>locked
>>>>box held what Smith claimed to be the gold plates
>>>>bearing this reformed Egyptian Chaldee Jewish
>>American
>>>>Indian history. Are you believing this thus far? If
>>>>so, the Golden Gate Bridge is still for sale!
>>>>
>>>>Sitting in one-half of a room divided into two
>>>>sections by means of a blanket hung from a rope,
>>Smith
>>>>would pretend to be translating aloud from the
>golden
>>>>plates and would dictate The Book of Mormon to his
>>>>secretary Martin Harris. Harris sat on the other
>side
>>>>of the blanket, afraid to peek at the plates for
>fear
>>>>he would be stricken with the plague, or the scab,
>or
>>>>hemorrhoids, and the botch of Egypt. LOL After many
>>>>days of such inventive labor, 116 pages of
>manuscript
>>>>had been written. All of it supposedly translated by
>>>>divine guidance by means of the magical seer stone!
>>>>
>>>>This is the foundation of the BOM (Book of Morons)
>>and
>>>>if you take any further time reading it in its
>>>>entirety, then you are more lonely than we thought.
>>>>Who in the hell in their right mind would believe
>>this
>>>>story? LOL!! You've got to be pretty gullible to
>>>>swallow such a history! Our history of Mount Sinai
>>and
>>>>Moses, Noahan deluge, parting of the Red Sea, the
>>>>celestial impregnation of Mary, et al, is certainly
>>>>more plausable than the Book of Mormon. What a joke.
>>>>There's a sucker born every minute!look at joann
>>>ellis
>>>>as well as matthew vanderpool. drugs for sex
>>>>Brother D. Thomas. aint tht like a whore? well i
>was fucking her so she is a cheap whore

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Anyone else annoyed by this Ellis guy?? -- MyLadyBanshee, 20:04:33 09/29/05 Thu

If he's banned, how does he mannage to come back like that??

By the way, I did a number check on the number listed in that post by "joann ellis" and it is listed to a Darrell Ellis...what a joke!!

Banshee

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: Anyone else annoyed by this Ellis woman -- terri, 00:49:21 10/09/05 Sun

>If he's banned, how does he mannage to come back like
>that??
>
>By the way, I did a number check on the number listed
>in that post by "joann ellis" and it is listed to a
>joann ellis
>
>Banshee

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: Anyone else annoyed by this Ellis woman?? -- donna gail (sicking), 23:44:13 10/02/07 Tue

>If she's banned, how does he mannage to come back like
>that??
>
>By the way, I did a number check on the number listed
>in that post by "joann ellis" and it is listed to a
>joann Ellis...what a joke!!
>she.s a sicko
>Banshee

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: Anyone else annoyed by this Ellis woman??? -- banshee, 01:14:40 07/05/08 Sat

>If he's banned, how does she mannage to come back like
>that??
>
>By the way, I did a number check on the number listed
>in that post by "joann ellis" and it is listed to a
>joann. Ellis...what a joke!!
>a cheap whore byany standwards
>Banshee

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]


[> Re: Rants about the "lost gospels" -- MyLadyBanshee, 21:43:28 09/25/05 Sun

Ah yes…the venom always seems to return!! How are you my dear Brother D Tomas?? I trust your “ministry” at the Chicken Ranch Brothel is progressing?? Any conversions to your faith from the ladies yet?

Though you weave an interesting and comical tale, my dear sir, I think you should actually review statements made by the people you speak of and not statements made by those who attacked them! Always go to the source or as close to it as you can get. Would you speak to a Pharisee or a Sadducee to learn of Christ? Or would you speak to the man himself, or if He were unavailable, his apostles? Now, I know your way of thinking and NO I am not comparing Joseph Smith to Christ, simply making a point using an example with which you may be familiar.

I happen to have quite a bit of Mormon literature and have not read anything of the accounts you have just mentioned…where could I verify these “facts” you have claim to? I would certainly appreciate your guidance is finding such literature.

However, I believe this discussion thread is about the supposed “Lost Books” of the Bible, and not the “let’s take potshots at the Mormons” thread.

Now on to the subject.

In 315 AD, Athenasius, the Bishop of Alexandria, identified the 27 Books which we recognize today as the canon of New Testament scripture. Many important writings never made it into the Bible at all. The Bishops of Rome and the Pope tried to eliminate the use of these other materials, Gnostic or otherwise, which were considered by the Church of Rome to be not just irrelevant but harmful and damaging (Most likely to the power they themselves wielded over the people)!! Many of the writings are still available for us to read, so in a sense are not “lost”

However, the Bible itself refers to several books that have not been found. Let me list a few;

Old Testament

1. Book of the Covenant (Exodus 24:4, 7)
2. Book of the Wars (Numbers 21:14)
3. Book of Jasher (Joshua 10:13 & 2 Samuel 1:18)
4. Book of Statutes (1 Samuel 10:25)
5. Book of the Acts of Solomon (1 Kings 11:41)
6. Book of Nathan (1 Chronicles 29:29 & 2 Chronicles 9:29)
7. Book of Gad (1 Chronicles 29:29)
8. Prophecy of Ahijah (2 chronicles 9:29)
9. Visions of Iddo (2 chronicles 9:29)
10. Book of Shemaiah (2 chronicles 12:15)
11. Book of Jehu (2 Chronicles 20:34)
12. Acts of Uzziah, Written by Isaiah (2 Chronicles 26:22)
13. Sayings of the Seers (2 Chronicles 33:19)
14. Prophecies of Enoch (Jude 14)

New Testament

1. Missing Epistle of Paul (1 Corinthians 5:9)
2. 2nd Missing Epistle of Paul (Ephesians 3:3-4)
3. 3rd Missing Epistle of Paul (Colossians 4:16)
4. Missing Epistle of Jude (Jude 3)

In Matthew 2:23, there is a mention of a prophesy that Christ would be called a Nazarene. A prophecy, please correct me if I’m wrong, not found in our Old Testament texts.


These are just a few of the references I have found. I have also read many fascinating papers on the subject.

Lord Veritas, stated; “I suggest you tell us how the Gospel of Thomas could have been written by Thomas when he was killed more than five decades before it was written.” All scriptures are copies of copies. To my knowledge, no “original” texts have survived. Even the New Testament came from Greek texts which were themselves copies of older texts. The King James Bible’s New Testament was translated from the Textus Receptus which is classified by scholars as the Byzantine texts, dated somewhere between the 11th and 12th century. It is also interesting that the Gospel of Thomas was not only preserved in a Coptic translation at Nag Hammadi but also in Greek fragments at Oxyrhynchus, proving that scriptural text were traditionally copied and recopied.

I’m sure there will be much more to discuss!!

Cheers!

Banshee

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]


[> [> Re: Rants about the "lost gospels" -- Observer with something to add, 10:44:24 10/20/05 Thu

Ok so there are books left out of the Bible... maybe they were left out for a good reason. Maybe not.

It does however leave some questions.

Enter Joseph Smith who seems to take advantage of this by proclaiming some outlandish (by traditional Christian dogma) beliefs. No one can refute them because all he has to say is "well your church is corrupt and has not provided complete information... here let me show you the "real" truth as revealed to me".

How convenient!

The fact that books are missing from the Bible in no way supports the claims of Joseph Smith. It's simple logic to follow.

He is just filling the holes of doubt to support his own misguided agenda. But in reality the two are mutually exclusive.

If you want to support Mormonism you should chose a different path of argument. Missing books? Big deal! This proves NOTHING.

Anyway, I hate to support the arguments of the likes of BDT and Robbins who are clear hate mongers... however when I see an invalid argument Im not letting my personal feelings get involved.

Peace

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> SATAN'S OBSERVER WITH NOTHING TO ADD, GET YOUR SATANIC A$$ INTO THIS THREAD NOW!!! -- Brother D. Thomas, 17:02:54 10/23/05 Sun

Satan's brainless observer,

What the hell do you mean that you hate to support arguments like those of the men of God like Brother D and esteemed Brother Nathaniel P. Robbins! Do you realize how ignorant it makes you look in the eyes of the Christian God, Jesus the Christ, when you say that True Christians are hateful? We are simply following in the footsteps of our Lord in being Judgemental and Intollerant, as demanded by Him, duh!

Our Bible tells the following, to wit: "Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offenses contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them" (Romans 16:17). The Lord Jesus Christ commanded, "Judge righteous judgment" (John 7:24). He told a man, "Thou hast rightly judged" (Luke 7:43). To others, our Lord asked, "Why even of yourselves judge ye not what is right?" (Luke 12:57).

“I will say it again: If anyone preaches any other gospel than the one you welcomed, let God's curse fall upon that person ( Galatians 1:8-10 ). “He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him” (John 3:36).

These are only a few of the passages to support the Christians position of judgment and intolerance of sin to anyone that doesn’t accept our faith.

In the name of the hung Savior.

Brother D. Thomas
Always enlightening the cultural Christian.
http://pub49.ezboard.com/ftruechristiansunitefrm7

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: SATAN'S OBSERVER WITH NOTHING TO ADD, GET YOUR SATANIC A$$ INTO THIS THREAD NOW!!! -- Truth hurts BDT, 11:42:27 10/29/05 Sat

>What the hell do you mean that you hate to support
>arguments like those of the men of God like Brother D
>and esteemed Brother Nathaniel P. Robbins!


Didn't I type in English? Or are you illiterate?

Don't you have some kool aid to go and drink now?

lmao

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: Rants about the "lost gospels" -- Sheepdog, 17:39:34 11/18/05 Fri

#Ok so there are books left out of the Bible... maybe they were left out for a good reason. Maybe not.

***I don’t know about you, but I wouldn’t like it if a government took over my freedom of religion. I wouldn’t like that government choosing what religious books I’m allowed to have.

#It does however leave some questions.
Enter Joseph Smith who seems to take advantage of this by proclaiming some outlandish (by traditional Christian dogma) beliefs.

***Joseph Smith had no idea about books left out or the total corruption that occurred in the 3rd century. He was only 21 when he translated the Book of Mormon. He had a 3rd grade education. What could he have known to take advantage?

#No one can refute them because all he has to say is "well your church is corrupt and has not provided complete information... here let me show you the "real" truth as revealed to me".

***Well, if you believe the first part, which there is plenty of evidence to support the claim, The only question then is about the validity of the “revelation”. Nobody here said that missing books = Joseph Smith is a prophet. He was indeed right about missing books and corrupt creeds.

#He is just filling the holes of doubt to support his own misguided agenda. But in reality the two are mutually exclusive.

***Have you read the Book of Mormon? What proof do you have that it was all his “misguided agenda” or that he was “just” filling in holes? None. You have no proof that there was no revelation. On the other hand, Joseph Smith has many people who testified that they had seen the plates and handled them. Some of those people even became enemies of him. You’d think an enemy would quickly deny this testimony wouldn’t you? But they did not do it.

#If you want to support Mormonism you should chose a different path of argument. Missing books? Big deal! This proves NOTHING.

***It was an Anti Mormon who started this conversation. We cover all sides here. Sometimes we lead the conversation, other times anti Mormons lead the conversation. I was taking each point that Lord V. had made and was answering specifics. Can I not do that? I don’t mind taking any path of argument my opponents choose. This forum used to be quite lively and full of intelligent conversations from both sides...until certain vermin started coming and filling it with obnoxious, hateful, filthy, mentally deranged, language and topic. And here they are, back again, just waiting to be caught misbehaving by the forum host. I think the host is out a whole lot of the time.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Re: Rants about the "lost gospels" -- Lord Veritas, 15:38:30 10/24/05 Mon

MyLadyBanshee,
If I were you, I would just ignore Brother D. Thomas. There's no reasoning with him, so don't bother. Some people just like to make noise to get attention and actually giving them attention, good or bad, only serves to make them louder.

>Now on to the subject.
>
>In 315 AD, Athenasius, the Bishop of Alexandria,
>identified the 27 Books which we recognize today as
>the canon of New Testament scripture. Many important
>writings never made it into the Bible at all. The
>Bishops of Rome and the Pope tried to eliminate the
>use of these other materials, Gnostic or otherwise,
>which were considered by the Church of Rome to be not
>just irrelevant but harmful and damaging (Most likely
>to the power they themselves wielded over the
>people)!! Many of the writings are still available for
>us to read, so in a sense are not “lost”
>
>However, the Bible itself refers to several books that
>have not been found. Let me list a few;
>
>Old Testament
>
>1. Book of the Covenant (Exodus 24:4, 7)
>2. Book of the Wars (Numbers 21:14)
>3. Book of Jasher (Joshua 10:13 & 2 Samuel 1:18)
>4. Book of Statutes (1 Samuel 10:25)
>5. Book of the Acts of Solomon (1 Kings 11:41)
>6. Book of Nathan (1 Chronicles 29:29 & 2 Chronicles
>9:29)
>7. Book of Gad (1 Chronicles 29:29)
>8. Prophecy of Ahijah (2 chronicles 9:29)
>9. Visions of Iddo (2 chronicles 9:29)
>10. Book of Shemaiah (2 chronicles 12:15)
>11. Book of Jehu (2 Chronicles 20:34)
>12. Acts of Uzziah, Written by Isaiah (2 Chronicles
>26:22)
>13. Sayings of the Seers (2 Chronicles 33:19)
>14. Prophecies of Enoch (Jude 14)
>
>New Testament
>
>1. Missing Epistle of Paul (1 Corinthians 5:9)
>2. 2nd Missing Epistle of Paul (Ephesians 3:3-4)
>3. 3rd Missing Epistle of Paul (Colossians 4:16)
>4. Missing Epistle of Jude (Jude 3)
>
>In Matthew 2:23, there is a mention of a prophesy that
>Christ would be called a Nazarene. A prophecy, please
>correct me if I’m wrong, not found in our Old
>Testament texts.
LV:You made a lot of interesting references above. I will research them as soon as I can (my schedule is tough, so I apologize for my sporadicity)

>
>
>These are just a few of the references I have found.
>I have also read many fascinating papers on the
>subject.
LV:I would like to hear of some of them, if you don't mind.
>
>Lord Veritas, stated; “I suggest you tell us how the
>Gospel of Thomas could have been written by Thomas
>when he was killed more than five decades before it
>was written.” All scriptures are copies of copies.
>To my knowledge, no “original” texts have survived.
>Even the New Testament came from Greek texts which
>were themselves copies of older texts. The King
>James Bible’s New Testament was translated from the
>Textus Receptus which is classified by scholars as the
>Byzantine texts, dated somewhere between the 11th and
>12th century. It is also interesting that the Gospel
>of Thomas was not only preserved in a Coptic
>translation at Nag Hammadi but also in Greek
>fragments at Oxyrhynchus, proving that scriptural text
>were traditionally copied and recopied.
LV:You rose an interesting subject in the above fragment as well, but unfortunately, it does not answer my question. My question was how could St. Thomas write a gospel that was dated many decades after his death. Your diatribe on copying processes does not answer this at all, since it does not prove that he did in fact write the "lost gospel of Thomas", nor does it address the methods of dating its authorship, or call into question the dating of St. Thomas's death. You merely say that scriptural texts are copied and recopied, which is an entirely different subject altogether. I know that its hard to avoid going down tangents in these debates, but next time, please stick to information of relevance when answering an objection.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]


[> The "Gospel" of Philip -- Lord Veritas, 10:49:49 02/03/06 Fri

For those who want to read this lost "Gospel" check it out at http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/gop.html
It has such brilliant sayings as this:
"Those who sow in winter reap in summer. The winter is the world, the summer the other Aeon (eternal realm). Let us sow in the world that we may reap in the summer. Because of this, it is fitting for us not to pray in the winter. Summer follows winter. But if any man reap in winter he will not actually reap but only pluck out, since it will not provide a harvest for such a person. It is not only [...] that it will [...] come forth, but also on the Sabbath [...] is barren. "
LV: So if winter is the world and we are not allowed to pray in the winter, it would logically follow that we are not allowed to pray in the world. So if we are not allowed to pray in the world, how exactly are we suppose to communicate with God to receive salvation?

"Light and Darkness, life and death, right and left, are brothers of one another. They are inseparable. Because of this neither are the good good, nor evil evil, nor is life life, nor death death. For this reason each one will dissolve into its earliest origin. But those who are exalted above the world are indissoluble, eternal."

LV: So good is not good, and evil is not evil. Gee, that makes perfect sense. This sounds a lot more like New Age or postmodern philosophy than Christian doctrine

And now for some background information:
The Gospel of Philip was written between 180 and 250 A.D. In other words, it was written after all of Christ's apostles were dead and buried. It is basically a collection of primarily Gnostic sayings. Although Wesley Isenburg claims to have linked seventeen of these sayings to Jesus, none of the sources of these sayings have been successfully identified. In other words, no one knows who wrote it. Basically, the Gospel of Philip's only claim to being a divinely inspired work is its name, which, unfortunately, is not nearly enough to make it qualify as scripture.

You will have to do better than this if you want to prove that there are scriptures that are not included in the Bible.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]



[> Re: Rants about the "lost gospels" (another exploration of one of Sheepdog's tangents) -- XXXXX, 12:26:54 05/24/08 Sat

>Hello again, Sheepdog,
>You mentioned that there were other texts that did not
>make it into the Bible. Please put all info about
>those here. To help you get started, I suggest you
>tell us how the Gospel of Thomas could have been
>written by Thomas when he was killed more than five
>decades before it was written. Write as much as you
>need to write about the subject here, so that you will
>no longer have to use this as a distraction from the
>salvation doctrine argument, either.
HUH ?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]



[> Re: Rants about the "lost gospels" (another exploration of one of Sheepdog's tangents) -- Capital Rendition, 09:45:24 03/20/09 Fri

Regarding the "Nazarene" prophecy":

5. For, lo, thou shalt conceive, and bear a son; and no rasor shall come on his head: FOR THE CHILD SHALL BE A NAZIRITE UNTO GOD FROM THE WOMB; and he shall begin to deliver Israel out of the hand of the Philistines.
6. Then the woman came and told her husband, saying, A man of God came unto me, and his countenance was like the countenance of an angel of God, very terrible: but I asked him not whence he was, neither told he me his name:
7. But he said unto me, Behold, thou shalt conceive, and bear a son; and now drink no wine nor strong drink, neither eat any unclean thing: FOR THE CHILD SHALL BE A NAZIRITE TO GOD FROM THE WOMB TO THE DAY OF HIS DEATH.
(Judges 13)

A "Nazarene" was one from "Nazareth", which was the the Nazirites. At the time of the prophecy, there was no Nazareth; at the time of Christ, it was a colony of northern Essenes (distinct from the more ascetic southern Essenes of Qumran), the primary inheritors of the Naziritic traditions (though the Pharisees has a ritual mimicking it, referenced in Acts in one of Shaul's/Paul's visits to the Temple).

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]


[> [> Re: Rants about the "lost gospels" (another exploration of one of Sheepdog's tangents) -- CR (again), 09:49:41 03/20/09 Fri

>A "Nazarene" was one from "Nazareth", which was the
>[town of] the [women] Nazirites.

Board software deleted angle-bracketed words.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: Rants about the "lost gospels" (another exploration of one of Sheepdog's tangents) -- XXXXX, 16:29:41 07/15/09 Wed

>>A "Nazarene" was one from "Nazareth", which was the
>>[town of] the [women] Nazirites.
>
>Board software deleted angle-bracketed words.
HUH ?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]





Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.