| Subject: Good assessment......very fair |
Author:
Nina
| [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 01:14:04 12/29/02 Sun
In reply to:
clipper
's message, "Personal OPINIONS : Miss Chinese Vancouver 2002" on 18:22:46 12/26/02 Thu
>1. Overall performance was really really good. Olivia
>did really well that night, but obviously the judges
>felt others did better. I personally felt she should
>have gotten something, like the talent award, but her
>dancing talent wasn't as unique as #5's talent, so I
>can see why #1 didn't get it.
>
>2. Overall, she gave me the feeling that she was
>nervous all night and didn't have as much confidence
>as #6. But she does have a bit of that so-called
>'winner's look'--maybe that is the only reason why she
>won, afterall this is a beauty pageant mostly based on
>LOOKS. Her talent part just accentuated her look and
>assured the judges that they were making the right
>decision. Many of the other girls did better than her
>during the interview, so i fail to belive that her
>interview contributed a large part to her win.
>
>3. Very modern, westernized look. She did really well
>and I feel that her place was well deserved. She
>didn't have the winners look judges look for, but she
>was such a perfect overall package (that didnt quite
>fit into the classic chinese culture) that night that
>3rd place was pretty much hers from the start. But you
>could tell she wasn't very happy to receive 3rd place
>if you observe her expressions when they announced her
>name. She didnt exude the confidence a top 3 winner
>shold have either.
>
>4. Definitely one of the most underrated girls. Very
>pretty, pleasant smile. I think the only reason why
>she faltered was because of her lack of confidence in
>her eyes and voice--you could tell she was shy, but
>not nervous, just SHY. She looked incredibly elegant
>the whole night and I totally thought she would get
>3rd place ( a tie between #4 and #3).
>
>5. Confident and stood out well. Well deserved
>placement for the Talent Award--it was unique and she
>did it so incredibly confidently that i hadn't doubted
>for a second she would have won--infact, her
>confidence made me think that if she had done any
>other talent, she still would have won due to her
>confidence. I also noticed that she looked the
>healthiest out of all the girls, and was very well
>spoken at both the intro and interview.
>
>6. Elegant, poised, and she knew what she was doing.
>Her smile was very real, natural. She gave me the
>impression of Miss toronto's 2002 first place winner
>during her interview--she didnt smile too much, but
>her eyes told a whole different story. She had a 'too
>chinese' look (like FOB china/ classic chinese girl)
>so i can understand why she took 2nd place. But
>overall, she had one of the best performances all
>night.
>
>7. Confident look.. maybe a bit too confident, because
>she didn't look like she was smiling, but looked a bit
>too cross. Her talent was a great one and she looked
>really elegant the whole night. I thoguht she would
>get 1st or 2nd, but she also gave me a slight robotic
>feeling throughout the night.
>
>8. Fun bubbly look. the talent was unique but probably
>not a good one for the show.. compared to the others
>it was rather boring (same with #6's painting/poetry
>thing). She did well, but for some reason, she didn't
>do anything to make her standout in my mind. Don't
>know why.
>
>9. Quite the mature looking one in the group. Her
>talent was good, but maybe just a bit too sexy for
>MCV. She was another underrated girl--if her mandarin
>was better and quite possibly the hair style, I feel
>she would have gotten 3rd place. She looked elegant
>the whole night, but her command of the chinese
>language might have caused her to falter.
>
>10. Good performance the whole night, but her posture
>isn't too great and her talent didnt really do it for
>me. Like #8, she didnt really do anything to standout
>in my mind, but she had good height and was well
>spoken.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] |
|
Feedback: 