VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456789 ]
Subject: The Page Privilege(?)


Author:
Starla
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 21:50:13 02/25/05 Fri
In reply to: RockGroupieCom 's message, "Jimmy Voted #1 Kid Lover" on 19:28:34 02/24/05 Thu

Did you ever see the article in GQ a few years ago focusing on the notrious LA rock&roll hotel? People interviewed said there were other young girls around who were no more than thirteen years of age. Some said, in retrospect, they couldn't believe either a parent or police didn't intervene at any time, not to mention hotel managers.

The story goes that JP saw a photo of LM when she was thirteen & asked about her for a while. Sometime later, they met, but she was afraid & intimidated by him. When she was close to fifteen he pressed harder - even had someone go & 'get her' from what she says.

What ensued is almost M. Jackson-like; he was in the Crowley phase & had a walking stick, cloke & hat - almost as he was assuming a character. She said then that she was pressured into consenting, but did - he was more or less seductive w/the way he went about grooming her for this. And intimidation was knowingly part of it.

Now some have said 'these girls were beyond their years' (even though there's a difference b/w thirteen, sixteen & nineteen), but what does it say? They had unsupervised homes, where god-knows-what happened to them in prior years. This is true of ones who had some money & those who did not, although the latter would be even more vulnerable.

Adults who partake in these actions know what they are doing. They do it for a reason, know that it is wrong & can be harmful. They rationalize it by being marginally kind to & spending money on the girls and justify it by the privileges that go along w/being a talented celebrity - one of which is massive ego-stroking by enablers who abet these behaviors.



>http://www.amiannoyingornot.com/(c3fnoi55ed2wouzke51juk
>nz)/collection.aspx?collection=481
>
>Sorry for being absolutely clueless on this subject.
>I knew about Lori Maddox back in the 70s when Jimmy was in >his 20s. I guess I never knew he was so notorious for being a >pedophile. Seems like everyone knew it but me. Apparently,
>in 1985, Jimmy was interviewed and made the excuse that he >never did anything someone didn't want him to...That's not
>the point Jimmy.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: The Page Privilege(?)Bebe20:01:00 02/26/05 Sat


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.