More Mendacity From Moore -- Christian Theology Discussion Group

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09:05:14 01/08/03 Wed
Author: Sola Scriptura
Subject: More Mendacity From Moore
In reply to: Sola Scriptura 's message, "Jack Howell's Argumentum ad Hominem Attacks & Anthropomorphite God - His Lies Continue" on 00:03:44 01/08/03 Wed

Good old Rt. Rev. ~~~~8}, Inc:
"..... at no time did I ever claim "authorship" for any of Dake's writings. That is an outright lie and is to be expected from the members of that cyber-cult posting at the Gossip and Slander board who resort to such tactics when they have been refuted. - - -Rev. Jack Howell As always, carefully selecting and parsing his words as well as a former Commander in Cheat.

Here is only one of many specific quotes which tend to clearly discredit the mendacious �bishop��.

"What we mean by Divine Trinity is that there are three separate and distinct persons in the Godhead, each one having His own personal spirit body, personal soul, and personal spirit in the same sense each human being, angel, or any other being has his own body, soul, and spirit."

The question is; WHO would any reasonable reader that came upon that post which began with; "What we mean by�.. and concluded with the signature as: �Rev. Jack Howell� naturally believe that post was authored by? Anyone who has even vaguely dealt with The Rt. Rev., Inc knows that this is his methodology which is conceived not by mere accident but it is cleverly calculated BY DESIGN.

The dirty little secret is; Rt. Rev. Serpent Egg, Inc. has ALWAYS tried to exclude credits attributing his hundreds of cut and pastes to their rightful aberrant authorship. This has only seen any change in his patterns since the time it became an issue of contention among those who called him on his slimy methods. But contrast his refusal to give proper credit for his stolen works, with the fact that he nearly always SIGNS HIS NAME at the end of his posts! Coincidence? He has recently also fancied attaching his photograph to the posts as well. Why, he chooses too this practice is another mystery. So when the post fails to state clearly (hundreds of times to similar posts): (Dake's Annotated Reference Bible, N.T. pg. 280, column 1) does anyone think it could have been an oversight?

The record shows: It was only when he was confronted by persons who recognized the passages Rt. Rev. Fowler was using as not originating with him and told him he was practicing deception and fraud that he on occasion gave the author credit. In the past he has had the mendacity to claim that �the original post was credited� and he therefore stated that he had fulfilled his obligation to the rightful author. Legality and copyright laws aside, this was also proven by using archives of his own posting record to be a total fraud. When asked to present a record to support his claims of awarding credits, he of course could not do so and willfully allowed the topic fade.

Again, the fact is when this particular quote first began appearing, and many others like it with words such as "What we mean by�..� those who are not familiar with Rt. Rev. FOWLER�s mendacity and congenital duplicity would naturally believe that the authorship of the writing is ALSO the person who signs their name to the post as �Rev. Jack Howell�

When the guileful Rt. Rev., Inc. cunningly says recently; �.."..... at no time did I ever claim "authorship" for any of Dake's writings.� We can agree with his cleverly crafted, parsed statement. No one is claiming Jackals said �NOW HEAR THIS!!!!! I, Rt. Rev. FOWLER wrote this! I am the author�

Notice, though, he just craftily happens to omit all reference to copyright credits, while at the same time never forgets to sign HIS name to his posts. It is a famous Rt. Rev. Serpent Egg, Inc. strategy of �How can I fool �em today�

And so goes the deception, lies and games of a wicked man who claims to represent Jesus. When he is exposed, he re-coils like the gutter viper he is known to be and hissssssssses and spits and piles more coals on his head ��That is an outright lie and is to be expected from the members of that cyber-cult posting at the Gossip and Slander board who resort to such tactics when they have been refuted. - - -Rev. Jack Howell�

Notice he didn�t forget the signature. ;>)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]