Context Jackals - Nice Attempt To Define Misery Down To Your Level - No Cee-Gar! -- Christian Theology Discussion Group

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:50:03 12/28/02 Sat
Author: Sola Scriptura
Subject: Context Jackals - Nice Attempt To Define Misery Down To Your Level - No Cee-Gar!
In reply to: Dolly Llama 's message, "Moore of Bishop Beezle Bubba�s Elusive Truth & Re-Writing of History" on 08:55:19 12/25/02 Wed

Jackals says the above is "an example of "Sola's" self-exaltation:" It Is? Context, Jangler!

Poor bedroom bishop's agenda has always had problems with the context of any given sentence/statement. His evil spirit has prompted his selective reasoning to kick into action and purposefully misrepresent the CONTEXT of WHY I listed some of my background in above post which goes directly to Jackals heart and motivation, NOT my lack of Glorifying God for the blessings I am bestowed. You see, Jackals forgot the point of the paragraph�s reason for listing those accomplishments so he could selectively edit them to purposefully change the structure of the intended point it addressed. He has interjected a false purpose to the comments and has attempted to make it into a testimony. When I offer a testimony he will know it.

What Jackals the Jangler omitted from the paragraph when he represented it elsewhere were the opening sentences which laid forth the CONTEXT of what was to follow which was this:..... "just for the record; regarding Jack's page design? Sola "DOES know what she is talking about" when she says his page ......looks like an over heated calliope. She has extensive art background." Then I proceed to make my point with FACTS pertaining to my design background. It is called backing up a statement.

Jangler Jack is a pitiful, hate filled, 50-year old man who has chosen to still live at home with his parents. He is employed by Wal-Mart in an undemanding, dead-end job as some sort of a clerk. �Department Head� as he likes to embellish it (and he knocks others achievements???). From all appearances, Jack Howell is an ambitionless sponge that has no particular skill, endowment, talent or achievements to claim for his own. So he made a life for himself that delights in tearing down and dismantling the considerable efforts of others.

He has apparently made no effort in his life to develop any particular aptitude. So he sits in his parents house in front of a computer and pretends to be an important �bishop� He calls himself �Rev. Jack Howell� but the truth of the matter is that he has never even run a congregation! For someone like this to impugn others and their accomplishments does, perhaps, expose the heart of the reason of why Jack has so few friends and blessings in his shallow life.

Jackals revels in knocking others when ever the occasion manifests itself. When the opportunity does not exist to bring others to his contribution-less level, Jangler will INVENT the opportunity to insult others efforts, and their achievements and attempt through dishonest re-definition of their words to define others according to his own template of a sluggard�s slothful lazy life.

No class Jack.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]