Re: Do "The" Reverend PFAKE's Actions EDIFY the CHURCH? or do they only satisfy his BELLY? -- Christian Theology Discussion Group

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:02:38 09/28/02 Sat
Author: Jack Howell was called to his ministry by & for Jack Howell
Subject: Re: Do "The" Reverend PFAKE's Actions EDIFY the CHURCH? or do they only satisfy his BELLY?
In reply to: demon jack is twice dead 's message, "Re: Do "The" Reverend PFAKE's Actions EDIFY the CHURCH? or do they only satisfy his BELLY?" on 15:15:04 09/25/02 Wed

Jack�s attack on Sola was entirely dishonest, cheap,
and low. It was utterly hollow. It was wanting of
biblical authority, of factual evidence, of
constructive ideas, very nearly of facts--bereft of
anything other than taunts and jibes and
embarrassingly obvious lies. In short: Business as
usual for a guy who calls himself �bishop� yet has no
biblical calling to do such.

In addition, it was breathtakingly hypocritical, a
naked visceral assault delivered in smarmy tones of
moral condescension from a man pretending to be
superior to mere believers of Christ. It was wretched.
It was vile. It was contemptible. But I understand,
that this is the was that man ALWAYS conducts his
affairs. He is what his reputation states: Jack Howell
is UTTERLY WITHOUT any moral compass. He is dead man�s
bones.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]