Re: We at This Forum Certainly Have Our Arguments With Falwell BUT..... -- Christian Theology Discussion Group

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:54:37 10/04/02 Fri
Author: tamarisk
Subject: Re: We at This Forum Certainly Have Our Arguments With Falwell BUT.....
In reply to: Sistah Dolly Happy Feets 's message, "We at This Forum Certainly Have Our Arguments With Falwell BUT....." on 23:21:00 10/03/02 Thu

I didn't read the whole of the article but Falwell is an irritation. While he considers himself Evangelical(actually Neo-Evangelical), he is hardly a fundamentalist. He lied a few years ago stated he would alway keep Thomas Road Baptist Church an Independent Baptist Church. However, it was not long after, he aligned them with the Southren Baptist Convention. The SBC has many liberal elements within its ranks, as ordained over 1,000 women from its bible universities, and is heavily entrenched in the Masonic Lodge of Freemasonry. About 25% of SBC pastors and deacons are lodge members.

That "70 million" Falwell mentions have about the same knowledge of Scriture as Falwell. One which is skewed. These are the same "Christian" folks who yammered during the past presidential election stating, "Christians must support OwlGore with Joseph Leiberman as the VP choice. In their minds, you must support the ticket with a Jew on it to "be right with G_d." Thus, you are supporting Israel.

Your typical Kumbaya/Pacadorian Christian cannot discern who or what is a Jew. What has and will happen to the Nation Israel is told in the Book of Zechariah. In Chapters 9-14:21 gives the Two Burdens. They give the thought of Israel's relationship to the four gentile world powers, chapters 1-8 pertain to Israel as they were under the Medo-Persian Empire; chapters 9-10 pertain to Israel as they were under the Grecian World Empire; chapter 11 pertains to Israel under the Roman World Empire; and chapters 12-14 pertain to Israel after the times of the Gentiles has come to an end, and time when G_d will purify the nation and Messiah will visibly reign over it.

There is a message for Mags here in Chapter 13(verse 7) concerning the truth of a Triune G_d. G_d is not the author of confusion. The Lord of hosts refers to His(My) Shepherd and a contrast to the false prophets mentioned earlier in chapter 13.

The dual nature of Y'shua HaMechiach is set forth here. The man indicates that He is 100% man; my fellow(Hebrew 'amit--fellow, friend, companion, associate) indicates that He is 100% G_d. There is no stronger way that the Lord of hosts could say that His shepherd is His equal--G_d of very G_d!

Y'shua applied the smiting of the Shepherd and the sheep, not only to his disciples, but to the dispersion of Israel as a nation. The Lord promises He will intervene on behalf of the remnant, described as "little ones," as an expression of tender affection for them.

Falwell impresses me as one of those false prophets with an agenda. Luther, it must be remembered, was a great supporter of Jews until the end of his life. He became bitter because Jews were not converting to Christianity as fast as he thought they should. Luther, and not Hitler, fostered the idea of marking Jews with an armband with the Mogan David, the Star of David.

The Mogan David is a perversion, a sign of evil among the Nation Israel. If I were Prime Minister for a day, I would erase it from the Israeli flag. The Israeli flag, minus the Mogan David, is an exact copy of the Tallit, the prayer shawl. That is the commandment of the Mosaic Law to border the Tallit in blue. Many, such as mine, have the first verses of the Shema embroidered on it. There are some boardered in black signifying mourning for the destruction of the Temple. The only major difference between the Tallit and the True Israeli flag is the Tallit has zitzit(tassles with knots) on the corners. Another commandment of the Law. Those knots exactly correspond with the Hebraic Aleph-Bet. There are numerical values for the consonants in the Hebrew Aleph-Bet.

The name of G_d in the Hebrew is Yud-Hah-Vav-Hah based upon the Aleph-Bet and corresponds with the exact number of knots in the zitzit. This, every Jewish man knew what Y'shua taught about entering into their prayer closet. You just enter into your prayer tent by coverning your head with the Tallit, holding the zitzit in your hands. Thus, you are holding the very name of G_d in your hands while you pray.

Falwell needs to repent of his Neo-Evangelical slippery, slope of compromise.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]