Re: Same old debate -- universitydancesport.com forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6 ]

Subject: Re: Same old debate

Author:
Ian

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:04:06 10/16/03 Thu
In reply to: Robin 's message, "Re: Same old debate" on 09:48:04 10/16/03 Thu

Robin, sorry I've ignored some of your quesitons to avoid recovering old ground.

aggregating marks in the
>1st round will be more difficult as people have
>different numbers, but these objections are more
>practical than fundamental and could be solved...

EG by having whole team with same number, only need to call out numbers from second round of divisional comp (SF in 48 team event) based on 20sec*3 dances that adds two minutes to the overall comp, hardly significant.

>Ali's proposal suggests to mark the event as a 4-dance
>under the BDC skating system. So rule 10 would have
>broken the tie.

Which could have been applied to the old system. Rule 10 is a seperate issue.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: Same old debate	Ali	10:33:56 10/16/03 Thu
Re: Same old debate -- Tim C, 10:43:32 10/16/03 Thu Re: Same old debate -- Ian, 11:27:02 10/16/03 Thu