Re: Don't agree -- Flambers Drugstore

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Sat, March 19 2005, 5:26:02
Author: Peter van der Hoog
Subject: Re: Don't agree
In reply to: Katerina 's message, "Don't agree" on Sat, March 19 2005, 2:33:24

>Not for all of them. There are a lot of ppl who don't care of how they look like cause they are busy with something more important. Others like to shock public and specially try to look ugly: they want to get attention this way and not to be "like all".

To look fit is an advantage in a group of social animals, especially when food has to be divided. Unfit members are the last ones to get a share.

>Unfitness for who? For other ppl? But when u love urself and others think u "unfit" the most natural feeling is "not loving others"(I am OK others are not OK).

That would be, in a group of social animals, a very bad strategy.

>U wrote a poem or a play and u don't want to show it to others not cause u consider it bad but cause it is too personal.

To recite a poem in public is exactable; to have sex in public is considered bad taste.

>My opinion is too amateurish. Scientists study the behavior of apes for years not just an hour or two.

It would be a dull world when only experts are allowed to give opinions.

>Yes, Fla was surprised and said she never heard of that investigation and asked which newspaper it was.

Sorry, I can't find back the source of this news item.

>She also find it very strange, because how can u teach someone to believe in God?

She manages to bring God into every subject, even when it is totally irrelevant.

>Physical attraction is so relative, someone can score me 10 and someone else can score me 0, while I score myself 6.

Physical attraction is not relative at all. See for example:

http://www.viewzone.com/faces33.html

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Don't agree -- Katerina, Sat, March 19 2005, 6:38:02
- Re: Don't agree -- Peter van der Hoog, Sat, March 19 2005, 9:19:48
  - Re: Don't agree -- Katerina, Sat, March 19 2005, 10:11:24
    - Re: Don't agree -- Peter van der Hoog, Sat, March 19 2005, 18:01:04
      - Re: Don't agree -- Katerina, Sun, March 20 2005, 3:40:09
        I agree! -- Peter van der Hoog, Sun, March 20 2005, 17:44:59
        Re: I agree! -- Katerina, Mon, March 21 2005, 10:11:27
        Re: I agree! -- Peter van der Hoog, Mon, March 21 2005, 14:44:09
        I can't just take it on faith -- Katerina, Tue, March 22 2005, 3:28:15
        Re: I can't just take it on faith -- Peter van der Hoog, Tue, March 22 2005, 6:56:08
        Did I say that? -- Katerina, Tue, March 22 2005, 7:21:27
        Re: Did I say that? -- Peter van der Hoog, Tue, March 22 2005, 12:05:03
        Re: Did I say that? -- Peter van der Hoog, Tue, March 22 2005, 12:09:40
        Re: Did I say that? -- Peter van der Hoog, Tue, March 22 2005, 13:07:03
        Not an integral -- Katerina, Wed, March 23 2005, 2:27:30
        Re: Not an integral -- Peter van der Hoog, Wed, March 23 2005, 7:04:14
        Re: Not an integral -- Katerina, Wed, March 23 2005, 8:14:11
        Re: Not an integral -- Peter van der Hoog, Wed, March 23 2005, 13:34:53
        Re: Not an integral -- Katerina, Wed, March 23 2005, 14:49:25
        Re: Not an integral -- Peter van der Hoog, Sun, March 27 2005, 11:46:07
        Re: Not an integral -- Katerina, Sun, March 27 2005, 13:11:03
        Re: Not an integral -- Peter van der Hoog, Sun, March 27 2005, 18:31:29
        Re: Not an integral -- Katerina, Mon, March 28 2005, 1:39:29
        Re: Not an integral -- Peter van der Hoog, Mon, March 28 2005, 4:38:07
        Re: Not an integral -- Katerina, Mon, March 28 2005, 7:52:15
        Re: Not an integral -- Peter van der Hoog, Mon, March 28 2005, 8:36:21
        Re: Not an integral -- Katerina, Mon, March 28 2005, 8:58:48
        Re: Not an integral -- Peter van der Hoog, Mon, March 28 2005, 13:24:32
        So I supposed just to take ur thesis as an axiom? -- Katerina, Tue, March 29 2005, 2:42:25
        Re: So I supposed just to take ur thesis as an axiom? -- Peter van der Hoog, Tue, March 29 2005, 12:08:18
        Re: So I supposed just to take ur thesis as an axiom? -- Katerina, Wed, March 30 2005, 3:55:23
        One more off -- Katerina, Wed, March 23 2005, 10:05:48
        Re: One more off -- Peter van der Hoog, Wed, March 23 2005, 13:32:15
        Re: One more off -- Katerina, Wed, March 23 2005, 14:01:27
        You don't have to place yer results here -- Todd, Fri, March 25 2005, 9:25:06
        Re: You don't have to place yer results here -- Peter van der Hoog, Sat, March 26 2005, 6:17:40
        Were u a satanist according to the results indeed? -- Katerina, Sat, March 26 2005, 6:23:42
        Re: Were u a satanist according to the results indeed? -- Peter van der Hoog, Sun, March 27 2005, 6:55:34
        It is just a mirror -- Katerina, Sun, March 27 2005, 7:46:36
        Re: It is just a mirror -- Peter van der Hoog, Sun, March 27 2005, 11:12:34
        Re: It is just a mirror -- Katerina, Sun, March 27 2005, 11:35:52
        Re: It is just a mirror -- Peter van der Hoog, Sun, March 27 2005, 17:59:05
        Re: It is just a mirror -- Katerina, Mon, March 28 2005, 0:46:17
        Re: It is just a mirror -- Peter van der Hoog, Mon, March 28 2005, 11:59:46
        The link to the thread ur started on the forum there. (NT) -- Katerina, Tue, March 29 2005, 3:16:40
        Re: The link to the thread ur started on the forum there. -- Peter van der Hoog, Tue, March 29 2005, 11:30:43
        Re: The link to the thread ur started on the forum there. -- Katerina, Wed, March 30 2005, 2:57:29
        Yes, very stupid -- Todd, Mon, March 28 2005, 22:52:42