Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Wednesday, April 30, 06:08:32am

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

• Re: Harsh Criticisms perhaps ?There a poor side we gave them the first goal and started slowly continually giving the ball away. Even so Muniz and Sess should have scored. We were poor first half but much better when subs came on. Thought Sess Castagne and Andersen poor. In reality we dominated the second half but the poor start killed us. We should never have lost to an average team on the night. Marco will be tearing hi hair out. Never mind on to Chelsea. (NT) -- Alboy, Monday, April 14, 10:18:57pm (ec2-13-43-110-23.eu-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com/13.43.110.23)
  • Come on Alboy - be Honest if you’ll pardon the dig. You start off by saying they are a poor side then half way through the same paragraph they become an average side. Bourmouth did us from a straight from kick-off side under Parker and it happened virtually again. Lots of passes going astray, and shots and headers going straight to the keeper. I’m as mad as you but perhaps a little more realistic. Marcia’s face in the last ten minutes told you everything you needed to know about the game. (NT) -- Barry@ENF, Monday, April 14, 10:34:19pm (cpc95104-newt39-2-0-cust313.19-3.cable.virginm.net/77.101.245.58)
    • “Marcia” Oh dear. Marco of course. (NT) -- Barry@ENF, Monday, April 14, 10:39:25pm (cpc95104-newt39-2-0-cust313.19-3.cable.virginm.net/77.101.245.58)
      • That face of resignation. He for the first time felt like may of us have done over the years. Bit worrying that his anger and frustration wasn’t th (NT) -- CB, Monday, April 14, 11:02:50pm (213-18-164-18.customer.gigaclear.net/213.18.164.18)

  ---

• Have they had won 2 or 3 nil or they had scored the winning goal late on then fairs fair. However the wining goal was scored in the 58th second! We failed to score in 95 minutes of play so how on earth could we have won? Such a shame and a loss of opportunity! (NT) -- Fulham Si, Monday, April 14, 10:20:40pm (static-80-177-78-58.vodafonexdsl.co.uk/80.177.78.58)

  ---

• Let's face it, Fulham have always been the same. There was a lot of talk last after the Liverpool game about Europe etc, even potential CL qualification. One or two of us laughed it off due to the predictability of what was going to happen against Bournemouth. Failure to sign a striker once again proved costly. (NT) -- Samuel, Monday, April 14, 10:22:01pm (NoHost/81.78.226.36)

  ---

• Not Harsh at all. Was a game we needed to win…. We had to match there intensity we didn’t …we had to match there physicality we didn’t our crossing was awful our set pieces worse. (NT) -- Ffc, Monday, April 14, 10:22:59pm (NoHost/95.146.111.232)