VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Wednesday, April 30, 05:48:01am [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wednesday, April 23, 01:12:21pm
Author: eganonoa
Author Host/IP: pool-108-18-149-21.washdc.fios.verizon.net / 108.18.149.21
Subject: They did and they survived. We've had two seasons in a row where all the promoted teams were relegated and I'd expect the same to continue. I believe PSR isn't going to truly hold anyone back anymore.
In reply to: Same Old Story 's message, "Didnt forest and everton both get points deductions? There's obviously nuance on the wages side (and all operating costs) - i'm not speaking about wages as a % - i'm talking about total cost/loss. However Palace (and us) classify wages in terms of PSR, its still contributing to a total P&L cost of £155m (+ Andersen and ESR to come). All comes back to the big sale, which we appear to agree on, which was my point, rather than the specifics." on Wednesday, April 23, 12:57:01pm


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

  • On wages, what I'm talking about is a difference between how you've been talking of late of our wages and violating rules ("80% of turnover") and the way other clubs, e.g. Palace, have been pushing it. Check Palace's latest accounts. Right up front they say "player wages" are 50% of turnover, but then later you can see the full salary costs (as identically classified by us) as much higher (70%+). They are clearly taking the position that it's straight player wages and nothing more that counts. (NT) -- eganonoa, Wednesday, April 23, 01:21:41pm (pool-108-18-149-21.washdc.fios.verizon.net/108.18.149.21)
  • Again, i get that, but again, not what i'm talking about in this conversation. I think we can agree to disagree on how seriously/casually clubs are/will take FFP. No point over-debating, as it will be pure speculation. (NT) -- Same Old Story, Wednesday, April 23, 01:59:01pm (NoHost/84.66.35.162)
    [ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
    Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
     * HTML allowed in marked fields.
    Message subject (required):

    Name (required):

      Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

      E-mail address (optional):

    Type your message here:

    Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

    Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

    [ Contact Forum Admin ]

    Forum timezone: GMT+0
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.